White Revolution

Comment from Karen
Time October 8, 2008 at 4:15 pm

As a white woman, I strongly support W R because I have seen so many interracial kids suffered here in southern California. Same thing with Native American tribe, Jews, etc. Now it is about this time for white people to preserve our Anglo hertiage ! Bravo

Comment from White Racism in Russia
Time October 18, 2008 at 5:52 am

Wellcome to Russian racist website http://www.rne.org/ and http://center-rne.org/forums/index.php

Comment from Sarah
Time October 21, 2008 at 10:50 pm

Actually that is not true. 75% of the united states is white….. so 3/4. Meaning the majority is white. So white people, I am one myself, are not being cast out. Your facts are wrong. Do some checking before you post those things next time. And in the census almost 97% of those people saying they are caucasion are only of one race. Not mixed with anything.
http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/research/census2000/race_census/US_Racial%20Distribution.pdf

Comment from Edward
Time October 29, 2008 at 2:56 am

Sarah, the Census Bureau is including Hispanics in the 75% of whites. 90% of Hispanics consider themselves whites but they are not (I don’t understand why they are denying to accept their real origins). The only country in Latin America where whites are majority is Argentina, with 90% being of European descent, the rest of Latin American population is mestizo (mixed race: Native Americans, Black and White)

Comment from Herr Groobee
Time October 31, 2008 at 1:00 pm

As long as you are not a nigger, you are alright by me.

Comment from A W
Time October 31, 2008 at 10:52 pm

This site is ridiculous!! It makes me ashamed that I am from the same state as these absurd idiots that came up with this website. You are closed minded and uneducated!

Comment from billy roper
Time November 1, 2008 at 10:18 am

Chinese cool, eh, Brooke? LOL. I guess that shows where your loyalties lie.

As far as being uneducated, I’d be happy to put my academic credentials up against yours. Prove us wrong with empirical evidence if you can, rather than engaging in ad hominem attacks. Otherwise, go back to China and see how much free speech they allow you there.

Comment from Bill
Time November 2, 2008 at 9:23 pm

AW says…”This site is ridiculous!! It makes me ashamed that I am from the same state as these absurd idiots that came up with this website. You are closed minded and uneducated!”

This is a Civil Rights website AW, and I imagine there were people saying the same thing about the concept of rights for slaves or Black people not to long ago as well.

So it would appear the more things change, the more they stay the same. Only now it is White People being denied their rights.

The time has come for White Civil Rights. And the fact that you parrot so many others with your charge of bigotry and ignorance upon our part, only PROVES our assertions that the school system in the U.S.A. is nothing more than a Marxist indoctrination complex.

There is a REASON why Karl Marx called for public eduction, and you are the result.

Comment from Vote For Change.
Time November 3, 2008 at 4:04 am

Vote for Obama.

Comment from Vote For Change.
Time November 3, 2008 at 4:19 am

Also, I very much enjoy the fact that comments must be approved by the webmaster. Just in case anyone proves any number your disillusioned, rambling batches of nonsense to be utter and complete bullshit, you can cut it off before it’s ever seen.

Although, I have a feeling you may post this out of spite.

That being said, to decide hate someone based on the amount of melanin in their skin is just the most ridiculous idea one could possibly conceive. And you can dress up your nonsense with as much socioeconomical and political reasoning as you want, but when all is said and done that is your only reason. It’s a child’s reason. “That’s different, I don’t like it.” As primitive as human reasoning can get.

On second thought, I doubt you’ll post this.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 3, 2008 at 11:01 am

Comments must be approved so that death threats and suggestions of violence by anti-White racists would not be posted. Noone is more intolerant than those who preach tolerance.

If the only differences between the races was skin color, then you would be correct, but every objective standardized IQ test ever administered shows differently. Every historical record of what happens when a nation becomes multiracial shows differently. The different achievements and contributions of the races to human civilization, technology, science, and medicine…well, they speak for themselves.

As to your post…I assume that you meant to say “delusional”, rather than “disillusioned”. Your other, grammatical errors, are forgivable.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 3, 2008 at 11:24 am

Racial differences are more than skin color:

http://inverted-world.com/index.php/articles/articles/the_reality_of_racial_differences/

Comment from Patrick
Time November 3, 2008 at 1:33 pm

Most of blacks are ape face, look at Patrick Ewing he looks like a gorilla, guys let’s visit Haiti and you will see how the world will be if it is full of blacks, a backward world, let’s save the world from black blood contamination, white racists must infiltrate within Republican and Democrat party and winning the persidency, they must stablish a secret plan for ruling America and the world.

Comment from White on Rice
Time November 3, 2008 at 6:33 pm

The thing is, White is not a race. There is no White continent or White country. It’s just a skin color and you may as well be for pro-blue eye power or something as random as that.

Comment from Jessica
Time November 4, 2008 at 12:25 am

I thought we all came from God?? God doesn’t see color so why should we??

Comment from Jessica
Time November 4, 2008 at 12:33 am

THIS IS TO PATRICK—

You can’t even spell, dude. I hope you can’t breed.

Comment from Shelley
Time November 4, 2008 at 1:09 am

“The thing is, White is not a race. There is no White continent or White country. It’s just a skin color and you may as well be for pro-blue eye power or something as random as that.”

Wrong. There are plenty of white countries. Canada and the United States were founded as white nations. So are all the European nations. Also - Australia, New Zealand, Argentina and Uruguay.

You obviously need remedial education.

Do you think white people owe reparations to blacks?

Do you think races exist?

Whites ARE Europeans. End of argument. Extremists such as yourself are truly sick in the head…

Comment from billy roper
Time November 4, 2008 at 3:29 am

If one believes in God, one must also believe that God made the different races of humankind, just as he made the different subspecie (races) within different species of animals. Who are you to think you know better than God, who therefore made the different races separate from one another, and intended them to remain distinct and separate?

According to traditional Christian teaching, in contrast to the egalitarian Judeo-Christian pap now taught in many mainstream churches, God created three races, and created them separately. The black and brown races were created in Genesis 1:26 on the 6th day of creation. Adam wasn’t created until after the 7th day of rest in Chapter 2, a Strong’s concordance will straighten this up for you. The truth is, there are 7 different Hebrew words in Scripture that get translated into “man”. In Chapter One of Genesis, the word is “Ish”. In Chapter Two, it is “Adam” (Strong’s Hebrew word #119). Proof of this is the definition of “Adam” as an adjective, “to have ruddy skin or to show blood in the face”, only Caucasians can do this completely. The reason for not mixing is simple, only Adam received the “breath of life and living soul”, the others didn’t. Therefore a hybrid would be incomplete or corrupted from the original design. Scriptures referring to race are Due chapter 7, 23:2, in the Old Testiment. The reason why many are wrong for thinking this law is different under the New Dispensation is the words of Christ in Matthew Chapter 5, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but to fullfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fullfilled.” Matthew 5:17-18. Since there is that whole tribulation thing, all has not been fulfilled.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 4, 2008 at 3:37 am

Races do exist, as any forensic anthropologist will tell you, just as different subspecie of animals exist. Pit bulls and poodles are both subspecies or races of the same species, canines, but I think we’d all agree that there are more genetic differences between them than just those which are physically obvious. In fact, the most important racial differences, whether we’re talking about pit bulls vs. poodles, race horses vs. Clydesdales, or blacks vs. Whites, are those of temperament and intelligence, rather than skin color…but they are equally real and substantial.

Comment from Patrick
Time November 4, 2008 at 12:56 pm

I’m from Sweden, O.K. Jessica? at least I can speak several languages. BLACKS ARE APE FACE!!!!

Comment from Patrick
Time November 4, 2008 at 1:57 pm

Jessica I’m Swedish, OK?

Comment from John
Time November 5, 2008 at 5:00 pm

Patrick said:

“BLACKS ARE APE FACE!!!!”

That they are! LOL

I’ve got to remember that line.

Comment from Tom
Time November 6, 2008 at 2:34 am

I wouldn’t worry about blacks so much.

The Mexicans and other Hispanics are the REAL problem.

Whites will be the minority by 2042

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon27.htm

Comment from Tom
Time November 6, 2008 at 2:35 am

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/american-whites-will-be-minority-by-2042-895574.html

Comment from Jason
Time November 6, 2008 at 11:51 pm

America is the land of the free. And it, America, has been long struggling to live up to its name. It still has a long way to go. I won’t even start to discuss the white vs. black debate, being that there are gangs within each race, that fight against each other. That is life though, we are humans, and in the end, humans are animals. I just hope that the end is a loooong ways away. It could seem like this is the start of an ending… but that would make the story of America a short story. America didn’t start until it really was EQUAL for all… for all races, for all religions, for all people, to live as they please as long as they do not cause harm unto others. My take on it, is that if you do not like this America, move somewhere else. America is the land of all of it’s citizens. It does not belong to one particular race or group.

True, that things once were different, but that doesn’t make them right. It is right for there to be equality among ALL races. The freedom to love whoever you choose, and to be in the company of who you choose. Including you all. If being in the company of only people of your race, then you do that…. but to say that a nation should be that way, is wrong as it gets. This is the age of unity amongst the HUMAN RACE. Sadly, it is the LACK of unity that has the nation so unstable, most of all now, with the wars, the state of the economy, and now a historic moment dealing with race, which certainly can cause division. It is times like this that will split the nation. This race Vs. that Race. Conservative vs. Liberal. But there will always be that group that throughout it all, will not loose sight on Uniting together and promoting peace and love. And it is with that group that i stand. All the love in the world to you all.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 7, 2008 at 10:23 am

You said “It is right for there to be equality among ALL races.”

And also…”This is the age of unity amongst the HUMAN RACE.”

Since you put it in all caps, I must assume that it is very, very important. So, either you believe that humanity is a race, rather than a species composed three or more races as all anthropologists and biologists believe, or you believe that since humans are all one race rather than a species, then dogs and cats and armadillos and houseflies are each one race rather than different species…so are you saying that humans should be treated equally with houseflies and armadillos, and vica-versa?

You see how muddy things can get when one confuses terms of taxonomical classification such as “race”and “species”, now.

In reality, humanity is a species, not a race. There are several races, or subspecies,within our species, just as there are within every species. Those races or subspecies are no more “equal” or interchangable than than poodles are with pit bulls.

Members of one subspecies differ morphologically or by different DNA sequences from members of other subspecies of the species. Subspecies are defined in relation to species. It is not possible to understand the concept of a subspecies without first grasping what a species is. In the context of many large living organisms like trees, flowers, birds, fish and humans, a species can be defined as a distinct and recognisable group that satisfies two conditions:

Members of the group are reliably distinguishable from members of other groups. The distinction can be made in any of a wide number of ways, such as: differently shaped leaves, a different number of primary wing feathers, a particular ritual breeding behaviour, relative size of certain bones, different DNA sequences, and so on. There is no set minimum ‘amount of difference’: the only criterion is that the difference be reliably discernible. In practice, however, very small differences tend to be ignored.
The flow of genetic material between the group and other groups is small and sometimes can be expected to remain so because even if the two groups were to be placed together they would not interbreed to any great extent.
Note the key qualifier above: to be regarded as different groups rather than as a single varied group, the difference must be distinct, not simply a matter of continuously varying degree. If, for example, the population in question is a type of frog and the distinction between two groups is that individuals living upstream are generally white, while those found in the lowlands are black, then they are classified as different groups if the frogs in the intermediate area tend to be either black or white, but a single, varied group if the intermediate population becomes gradually darker as one moves downstream.

This is not an arbitrary condition. A gradual change, called a cline, is clear evidence of substantial gene flow between two populations. A sharp boundary between black and white, or a relatively small and stable hybrid zone, on the other hand, shows that the two populations do not interbreed to any great extent and are indeed separate species. Their classification as separate species or as subspecies, however, depends on why they do not interbreed.

If the two groups do not interbreed because of something intrinsic to their genetic make-up (perhaps black frogs do not find white frogs sexually attractive, or they breed at different times of year) then they are different species.

If, on the other hand, the two groups would interbreed freely provided only that some external barrier was removed (perhaps there is a waterfall too high for frogs to scale, or the populations are far distant from one another) then they are subspecies. Other factors include differences in mating behavior or time and ecological preferences such as soil content.

Note that the distinction between a species and a subspecies depends only on the likelihood that in the absence of external barriers the two populations would merge back into a single, genetically unified population. It has nothing to do with ‘how different’ the two groups appear to be to the human observer.

Therefore, regardless of their ability to reproduce with one another, if two related population groups do not do so to a large degree, they are separate species, or become so. If they do, then they are still separate subspecies (races), but not separate species. Meaning that humanity was at one time separate species, and could be again, or in fact could be for some,and not for others.

Hispanics, for instance, are racially mixed hybrids of Whites and Asians. They are now a separate subspecies, or race, of their own.

Comment from Angel Martin
Time November 7, 2008 at 4:04 pm

When you have to fabricate pseudo scientific evidence to support your agenda, you know you have a silly, baseless agenda. Don’t attempt to justify your belief in racial superiority scientifically, there is no real scientific basis. Be secure enough in your own ignorance to proudly proclaim that you are a bigot, plain and simple. You believe the white race is the best race, just because that for whatever reason makes you feel better somehow. Maybe you’re insecure about your tiny penises, maybe you feel threatened and inferior and thus overcompensate, or maybe you just for whatever reason honestly believe the nonsense you profess…
Whatever the case, we now have a mixed blood man in office, the product of an educated white woman from Kansas, and en educated African man from Kenya. He was elected by more White people than John Kerry in 2004. He is a good and decent man who is brilliantly intelligent and a wonderful example of today’s America. He’s also very handsome and most probably well hung, so suck on that hillbilly retards =D

Comment from billy roper
Time November 7, 2008 at 4:50 pm

Angel;

As a skraeling, that is, the descendant of stone age savages who never invented a written alphabet on their own, it might be difficult for you, but please try to be specific about what part of my worldview cannot be supported by scientific and historical evidence? Saying that our scientific evidence isn’t true, then segueing into ad hominem personal attacks rather than attempting to offer your own or refute ours, simply reveals your intellectual inadequacy.

Have you noticed how the media are trying to downplay the fact that the election of Obama has been in fact the most racist election in American history?

Obama has not united America, he has divided America.

96% of blacks voted for Obama.

96% reveals that they did not vote on politics - they voted on the grounds of race.

That is simply the most racist vote in American history.

That is a racist block vote - that is a declaration of racial separation, it is not a declaration of unity. That is the declaration of a community that sees itself as a racial block - and it is the declaration of a future civil war.

When a racial group has become so racially polarised that it votes for a politician simply on the grounds of their race - then this is the fundamental precurser to a race war.

That 96% vote says “we are black first and foremost and our politics are based simply on race.”

Comment from Angel Martin
Time November 7, 2008 at 5:43 pm

Oh snap, I think you just insulted me for being Native American? Cool, that’s a first. It doesn’t happen nearly as often as I would like, due to my blue eyes and pale skin, both of which I inherited from my Norwegian grandparents. You’ve really made my day.
The fact is, I enjoy hurling immature insults, it’s fun, especially when dealing with immature minds such as those who actually invest time in a movement like this one. The only real reason to have these reactionary and frankly, very silly, racial beliefs is a deep seated insecurity.
A large amount of white people voted for Barack Obama because he is Black, that is something you’re gonna have to come to terms with. If you wanna call it racism, go ahead, but everyone likes Barack Obama regardless of his color. He’s a very very likable person and a brilliant politician. People are suckers for personality, whether or not that’s a good thing in terms of what’s best for the country. If you think there is something genuinely wrong with Blacks voting for a Black man…that kind of conflicts with the whole idea of tribalism and racial loyalty you and your racist ilk espouse. The truth is for you people, racism is only ok when you’re the ones guilty of it. You are becoming increasingly irrelevant in this society, and it’s rather fun to watch. How does it feel to know that 43% of the white electorate voted for a Black man? I can just imagine how much smaller that makes your penis feel. Think of all the white women who fantasize about their new Mr. President…certainly all the little white girls who grow up with a Black man as their president, the Father of Our Country, will have a totally different mindset about what a man is, what a husband is. It is an archetypal shift.
As far as scientific evidence for racial superiority…there is none, none that is respected by the scientific community. Scream Jewish conspiracy all you want, but it has been established that there is no basis for the belief that, for example, African Americans are inherently inferior to any other race. We are the exact same species. We are all Great Apes.
You people have been babbling about race wars for decades, a century perhaps, you jerk off to the idea. The truth is, the people who detest your movement the most and pose the biggest threat to it are young white [or SKRAELING---awesome word by the way, I think I'll start using it] people like me. We are ashamed of you, you are embarrassing. I wouldn’t really mind witnessing your genocide, to be quite honest, but it’s not something I’d campaign for. It’s actually more gratifying to watch your sect sink further and further into cultural irrelevance and isolation.

Comment from ahniyvwiya
Time November 7, 2008 at 10:18 pm

Mmmm…Skraeling. Really loving that one.

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time November 8, 2008 at 1:19 am

Actually Angel there is no way a skraeling such as yourself could foster the title of Native American because there is nothing native about a bunch of Mongolians (your Indians) crossing a land bridge and killing off the Americas orginal inhabitants. As has been documented here http://whiterevolution.com/primers/paleo-american-ethnic-diversity.pdf and furthermore here http://www.whiterevolution.com/forum14/showthread.php?t=56
You might want to find yourself a new title but skraeling has a nice ring to it. As far as the rest of your ranting and raving about scientific fact goes, just because you saw something on a MTV special doesn’t make it a fact, just merely multicultural propaganda which is obviously agenda driven. So what it all comes down to is our ” pseudo scientific evidence” vs. Multicultural propaganda that often,more times than not,contradicts itself.
Oh and you might want to go live out some sick slutty fantasy in the near future because your fixation on penises is really putting a damper on your ability to argue your point of view.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 8, 2008 at 9:48 am

I don’t think it’s unnatural for blacks to have voted according to their racial loyalties. On the contrary, I think it’s the most natural and healthy thing in the world. Whites should do the same. I was merely pointing out that it is a sign of racial civil war to come.

In the book The Wild Frontier: Atrocities during the American-Indian War from Jamestown Colony to Wounded Knee, historian William M. Osborn sought to tally every recorded atrocity in the area that would eventually become the continental United States, from first contact (1511) to the closing of the frontier (1890), and determined that 9,156 people died from atrocities perpetrated by Native Americans, and 7,193 people died from retaliations perpetrated by whites.

This aspect of Indian culture is what is referred to in that passage of the Declaration of Independence which complains of the King of Great Britain that:

“He…has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.”

The ancient Aztecs practiced human sacrifice. Tribes in the Northwest, as well as the Iroquois people, practiced slavery. Others were cannibals. Many were abusive to their wives and children. Inter-tribal warfare was common.

Comment from Alex
Time November 8, 2008 at 5:39 pm

In St. Petersburg (Russia) Midle Asians, Caucasians (in Russian language caucasian mean swarthy immigrant from Cacase Mountains ( Armenians, Chechens, Azerby etc.)) and at the last time Chinese who goes with expired visas in their passports or without them, and most scandalous they don’t understand Russian !!!
About me. I am an Policemen and every day I have strugle with invaders in my Great Country !!!

Comment from angelmartin
Time November 9, 2008 at 7:39 pm

Yeah, I figured you guys wouldn’t like the whole penis size thing. The truth hurts and stuff like that. But if penis size is such a silly thing to focus on, why do you let it control your entire philosophy on life and race?
Yeah…I need to watch MTV to get my information on anthropology when I major in evolutionary biology…makes sense.
I’m not sure if you think that I would feel ashamed to find that my ancestors mercilessly slaughtered an invading people bent on their destruction, but I don’t. They did what they had to do and I’m proud of them. Just as I am proud of the viking invaders from which I am also [directly] descended. Your willingness to shirk the overwhelming majority of scientific evidence AGAINST your fragile White fairytale is pretty telling of your mentality. While I do subscribe to the idea that paleo-Europeans may once have inhabited North America, due to the discovery of haplogroup X among some American Indians living and at least one Ice Age skeleton discovered in Illinois… the idea that it’s more likely they were killed by “mongoloids” than bred down is a leap. Even if it were true, so?
It’s interesting that you choose to emphasize my Native AMERICAN heritage over the rest, I’m not even sure how you found it out unless you checked my URL and if so I’m sure you would have noticed that I, uh, I’m rather European looking. Is it the “one drop” rule we’re applying here? I doubt most people, aside from other Native Americans, would really recognize my mongoloid characteristics.
I actually take it as a compliment to be called a savage, but that’s really only something an evolutionary biologist would understand.
Certainly though it’s rather naive to suggest that the ancient Europeans were decidedly more “native” than the Mongoloids. They were certainly the weaker though, apparently.
The whole issue is so mind-boggling in its ultimate insignificance, much like this website and its premise. Don’t you ever feel like you are wasting your energy on bullshit? Why is the idea of race mixing oh so terrifying to you people? It has happened since the dawn of man, no one is pure anything…if you knew anything about the evolution of man, you’d know that. The pointlessness of it all is overwhelming, which is why it’s glaringly obvious that these irrational fears stem from virulent insecurity.

Comment from angelmartin
Time November 9, 2008 at 7:42 pm

Jeez…a policeman, huh? That’s scary, that’s truly scary, you have no business on the force Jethro.

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time November 9, 2008 at 11:17 pm

Nice way to try to put words in my mouth angel but alas I don’t measure the White Mans ability to create every worthwhile civilization known to man by penis size. However given the fact that the animal with the largest penis on earth is a big dumb walrus does give credence to your penis size theory.

I guess if having a large penis puts you closer on the scale of being a big dumb walrus and having a smaller penis puts you further away on that scale, thus making one more intelligent. Well, I guess I am guilty as charged. But don’t fret, I find no insecurity in my penis size, you see I have five children. Apparently even small penis’s can get the job, they were intended for, done. So here’s hoping, according to Angel’s penis theory, that my four sons are less like unintelligent, but well hung niggers and more like short dicked White civilization builders. Does that about sum up your penis theory there Angel? Feel free to put your masters in evolutionary biology to work here in shoring up your penis theory.

Speaking of which, I find it interesting you claim to have a Masters in Evolutionary Biology and yet you seem to have a hard time grasping the evolution of man. It just so happens our very own Chairman has a Masters degree in Anthropology and I am sure he would love nothing more than to tear apart your indoctrinated understandings of evolution and man. Not to sound too modest, but he is quite good at it really. Oh who am I kidding, the man is an artist when it comes to ripping you multicultists a new asshole on this subject. So allow me to step aside so the man can do what he does best. Just promise you won’t cry after he is done, ok.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 10, 2008 at 10:27 am

http://whiterevolution.com/primers/paleo-american-ethnic-diversity.pdf

In my Master’s Thesis, “PaleoAmerican Ethnic Diversity”, despite your opinion of which I successfully defended before representative professors of the Anthropology and History departments, and they accepted the scientific validity of, I state that it was a combination of racial genocide and interbreeding by the Asiatic Mongoloids which destroyed the first Americans, who were PaleoEuropeans. (The same can be said of the struggle between our Cro-Magnon ancestors and the Neanderthal,which ended 30,000 years ago.)
The reason why it matters is first that the “original sin” of America is supposed to be our replacement of AmerIndians, and that if their ancestors were guilty of the same thing, that takes the curse off Manifest Destiny and removes a lot of the pretense for White guilt syndrome insofar as they are concerned. Secondarily, once a population disappears it doesn’t matter whether the cause was absorption and subsumation or extinction through wholesale slaughter, they’re still just as gone, forever.

Isn’t it funny that those who claim to support diversity oppose maintaining the natural diversity between the races which nature has created?

If you do study evolutionary biology, you know that essentially evolution occurs when population groups differentiate and specialize into distinct populations due to climactic and other environmental adaptations. Nature then allows them to compete, not just as individuals but as groups, to determine which are the “most fit”. That’s the “favored races” bit Darwin was talking about in the subtitle of “Origin”.

Frankly, it’s not necessarily a question of superiority or inferiority until all but one of the contemporaneous competing races or subspecie are extinct, and the winner gets to write history..that is, if they’ve managed to invent a written alphabet.

Every member of a population group should naturally be a proponent for the survival of their specific population group, if they are psychologically healthy. Of course, mixed race people have always been confused about their identities and loyalties. I’m sure that in southern France 35,000 years ago there was a young female like yourself, part Cro-Magnon and part Neanderthal, who was equally proud of both her Cro-Mag and Neanderthal ancestries, who felt that those who favored maintaining as pure a Cro-Magnon line as possible were wrong. She’d have felt personally threatened by the idea of keeping the two races separate. She might have even tried to shape her worldview and her interpretations of science and history, such as she knew them, to accomodate her psychological disquiet. But regardless of how she felt, to paraphrase Bogie, “the schizophrenic identity crisis of one mixed-race girl doesn’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy evolutionary struggle”.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 10, 2008 at 10:32 am

“Race, Evolution, and Behavior” in pdf form:

http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

Comment from angelmartin
Time November 11, 2008 at 4:21 pm

I do not oppose the idea of maintaining racial diversity, I just don’t think racial diversity is more important than equality and judging people based on their own individual merit, and I think if the only way to “maintain diversity” is to spew hatred [Chimp In Chief? Come on, you are better than that Mr. Roper, I know you are] then I don’t think it’s worth it.
It’s just not worth it.
What don’t you understand about people like me? People who are genuinely saddened by racism and all the things that come with it? We react angrily, we say angry things, but it comes from sadness and disappointment with the fact that some people just can’t let go of these toxic, dehumanizing ideas. It’s not as though this website is called “white appreciation, dedicated to the peaceful and nonjudgmental preservation of diversity among the races” it’s called White Revolution. It’s one thing to love your race and your ancestry and maybe worry that in the future it won’t exist in its current form, but it’s quite another to declare your superiority and totally demean and dehumanize other people. The “gay pride” movement is actually about what it claims to be about, gay pride, it’s not anti-heterosexual and it doesn’t profess superiority. If the white pride movement could control itself maybe it wouldn’t be seen as bigoted and malicious. I don’t know why it’s so difficult for you guys to embrace your own race without trashing other races.

Comment from TheMostWhiteManOnTheWorld
Time November 12, 2008 at 9:24 am

Hi! OJ! My name is Mehmed Urmuz. I’m from Syria. I moved to USA half a year ago with my whole family. I’m very interested in all things you are doing. For 3 years i had been stuying a lot about NS and I would like to join to organisation like yours. What should I do to join you?

Comment from billy roper
Time November 12, 2008 at 11:34 am

Mehmed,

We support, appreciate, and respect your people’s efforts in your own country to resist the oppression of your Zionist neighbor, but we don’t want you here in our country, (any more than you would want Whites or Jews flooding Syria) nor can nonWhites join White Revolution.

********************

Angel,

Maintaining racial diversity is more important than a quest for a mythical equality which never has existed and never can exist, neither between individuals nor between groups, because racial diversity is the mechanism by which the human species continues to evolve, whereas racial equality subverts human evolution. Like Communism, which promotes and unnaturally enforces artificial equality as well, it might be pretty to think that the world is a pink and blue padded day care center where we can all sing “Kumbaya” and hold hands in peace and love and harmony, but nature just doesn’t work that way.

When natural selection declares your population group the loser, or the least fit to survive, you don’t just get a time out. You go extinct. That’s forever. There are no bonus points for being a good sport or playing well with others.

Survival is a game that is played for keeps, and with the future of the species itself at risk, the stakes can’t be any higher.

We react with something less than courtesy and mutual admiration to those persons, groups,and institutions which we see as being threats to our race, just as a psychologically healthy person responds with passion to anyone or anything which threatens their family’s security or future. Our race is our extended family, after all. It’s a biological imperative.

To us, yes, it’s worth it. There’s nothing more worthy or important. Ten thousand years from now, either the human species will have continued to evolve in a progressive manner, or not, based on perhaps what we do or do not do in our generation. That’s more important than sparing someone’s feelings along the way.

Comment from angelmartin
Time November 12, 2008 at 2:28 pm

So if this is all a matter of Darwinism, why doesn’t this website have a section devoted to the fight against perpetuating bad genetics in our population? Why aren’t you guys just as worked up by the idea of retarded/deformed/genetically disadvantaged people being allowed to procreate?
There is just no way to argue with someone who believes “multiculturalism” is unhealthy for society. It’s the kind of thing you can either be for or against, but no matter what evidence you use to support either argument in the end it is all subjective, it’s all a matter of opinion.
Just because equality may never have existed doesn’t mean it shouldn’t. Just because murder has always existed doesn’t mean it should.
I believe those who share your beliefs should perhaps try to isolate themselves somewhere from the majority of the population who have better things to worry about. I don’t mean that to sound rude, but I think it makes sense that if you truly believe as you do it would be really wonderful for you guys to have your own society away from the world at large, since integration is such an unpleasant thing for you. And if what you say is true, you’ll have no problem progressing centuries beyond the rest of us as we are left to interbreed into oblivion.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 13, 2008 at 11:06 am

We do support Eugenics, and recognize that just as there is a natural inequality between the races, there also is inequality within our race. All life is not equal. We do believe that, until medical science has progressed to the point that the genetic factors such as chromosomal irregularities which are hereditary can be isolated, identified, and fixed in vitro or otherwise, then those with serious hereditary risks should not reproduce. I assume you are conversant with Eugenics, the study of hereditary improvement of the human species by controlled selective breeding. Think of it as a way of controlling the gas pedal on evolution.

White Nationalists would be more than happy to have our own independent homeland, but the establishment won’t allow White neighborhoods,or private White schools, or White stores, White businesses, and frowns on White cultural organizations, even when all of the above are voluntary. What makes you think they would allow Whites to voluntarily move to an area and secede and have a White nation? The U.S. and N.A.T.O. bombed Yugoslavia when the people there tried to sort themselves out along ethnic lines in 1999. How do you think the U.N. would respond to a voluntarily established White nation, even if there were no nonWhites living within its borders to complain? Having a racial homeland is allowed for the Jews, but not for Whites, I’m afraid.

Comment from angelmartin
Time November 13, 2008 at 6:36 pm

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,559284,00.html

Comment from billy roper
Time November 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm

Yes, the Vikings did travel the world and explore more continents and probably had more contact with other peoples than did, say, Africans. But just because an Arab is found buried with some of them doesn’t mean that ancient Denmark was a multiracial cesspool of diversity like most modern cities. Even if it was, though, that wouldn’t mean that races don’t exist, or that they necessarily interbred to a large extent. The Vikings buried horses, dogs, and slaves with their dead, as well.

The fact that they could identify skeletal remains as being “Arab” is in fact a reminder that racial differences are much more than skin deep.

That’s like saying that Nelson Mandela is White because the White Afrikaans in South Afrika lived contemporaneously with him, it doesn’t logically follow.

Bottom line: racial differences exist. Duh!

Comment from billy roper
Time November 14, 2008 at 1:58 pm

By the way, Linea Melchior, the lead scientist on the study, is Jewish. Don’t think that doesn’t drive her anti-White, multiracialist agenda.

Comment from OGLA
Time November 16, 2008 at 3:27 am

I don’t think that the whites are under threat at all, aren’t you just inventing threats?

Comment from billy roper
Time November 16, 2008 at 10:23 am

The Declining White Birth Rate

by James Buchanan

One of the greatest disasters facing the world is the disappearance of the White nations of the world. Every large White nation has a substantial non-White population. Europe has suffered a continuing invasion of Muslims since the 1950s. First Algerians invaded France, and Turks invaded Germany. Muslims are a plague all across Europe. France today is 25 percent non-White (mostly Muslim).

The biggest ongoing catastrophe is the United States. America was 90 percent White at the end of World War Two. Since that time, a succession of liberal politicians have worked to open the floodgates to Third World immigration. Today America is estimated to be somewhere from 66 to 70 percent White. The mostly Mexican illegal alien population in the US is estimated at anywhere from 11 million (by the Bush regime) to 20 million by an independent source, Bear-Stearns.

Back in the 1960s, ordinary White Americans could buy a nice house near the ocean in Southern California. Over the last four decades, that same house is likely to be priced well over a million dollars. The vast majority of Los Angeles is made up of non-White neighborhoods. Most of these non-White neighborhoods are plagued by gang violence. The few remaining mostly White suburbs are now massively over-priced thanks to supply and demand. Middle class Whites have no hope of raising a family in L.A. Most college-educated Whites (with good majors) also can’t afford to raise a family in southern California.

What has happened to L.A. is happening to all of America. The Mexican invasion is no longer just a border state problem. There are Mexican neighborhoods from San Diego to Chicago. Republican Congressmen made an attempt to turn illegal aliens into felons earlier this year, but the gutless Senate and the threat of a veto by “Jorge” Bush derailed that effort.

The average Mexican family involves little-to-no-planning and a teenage pregnancy. The average White family involves a lot of planning and buying a decent home. Not only does the Latino invasion cause skyrocketing real estate prices, the Latinos cause a huge tax burden on White tax payers. The illegal alien population in California costs the state at least five billion dollars per year. Every Mexican child in a California school, costs the government nine thousand dollars per year. Twelve years of public education amounts to $108,000 for every Mexican student. Most Mexican workers earn close to minimum wage or work for cash so they pay little taxes to compensate for the huge amount of money they take in government services.The Latino invasion of the public schools has forced many White parents to send their children to private schools which is yet another huge expense for Whites.

Another obstacle for White families is job insecurity. Our government has allowed major corporations to outsource millions of jobs. How far ahead can people plan when they see the jobs around them disappearing from year to year? Some Whites finish their college degrees only to find the jobs have disappeared by graduation day.

We need a government that keeps some reasonable control on big corporations. Companies like MicroSoft and IBM which were founded by White workers in America should not be allowed to set up high tech sweat shops in India and China. If we want the White population to remain stable, we can’t allow the future to be stolen from them. Young White people need some assurance that twenty or thirty or fifty million Latinos won’t be given an amnesty to satisfy big corporations and leftist politicians. They also need some assurance that their high tech jobs won’t be exported.

Back in the 1950s, most White people had job security, affordable housing, secure borders and a bright future. There was a “Baby Boom” among the White population. Today, everything has been reversed, and our brain dead politicians don’t realize what’s happened or they don’t care. Some politicians have seriously proposed bringing in more Mexicans to make up for the shortfall in the White population. We need to send these politicians to Mexico and turn the clock back to the 1950s when our government actually cared about the White population and what was best for it.

Comment from Velibor Milinkovic
Time November 21, 2008 at 10:48 am

Billy, i saw your comment about Yugoslavia, You don’t know how much anti-Americanism is spread in Serbia, we don’t understand it, why Christian white americans atacking Christian white Serbians, why the U.S. government defended traitor Bosnians and Albanians, we consider Bosnians and Albanians asians like Turks, they’re bacward and religious phanatics, they have the higher birthrate and are the most illiterate in Europe, why this traition from our brothers white Americans?, what was the intention of the American government?, Why U.SA. and European Union supported the independence of Montenegro, when we all know that Montenegro is Serbian, they speak Serbian and they´re Serbian orthodox, Why the republic Srpska is not recognized as independent, the U.S.A. and European Union want the autonomy of the Republic Srpska to be eliminated and they want free movement of people, you know those Bosnians live like Arabs, Why the European Union is doing that?, and now the European Union is promoting inmigration from Arab countries and blacks from Africa, given that coditions i don’t want my country to belong to the European Union, there is a free movement of people and africans and arabs will move to my country, i don´t want Turkey to be part of the European Union it would be a disaster, about that hybrid Barack Obama is a puppet which receives orders from white democrats, he is an hypocrite, he is a muslim disguised as a Christan but at the same time is allied with Jews, i’m sure that he will promote inmigration to the U.S. from Africa especially Kenya, but what is a Kenya? a country full of illiteracy, a country of cannibals, a country where 33% of people have AIDS, a country where 30% of people are muslim, do you want millions of Kenyans in your country?

Comment from B.H.
Time November 21, 2008 at 3:38 pm

You should all be ashamed of your selves! This is a terrible message and an evil organization. The ONLY reason i would ever visit this website is because i was told to research an EVIL and HATEFUL group of people that i consider to be a cult. DING DING we have a winner. I hate everything that you stand for. As a white American i am ashamed to be of the same race as YOU!!!

Comment from billy roper
Time November 21, 2008 at 5:38 pm

Quote: “The ONLY reason i would ever visit this website is because i was told to research an EVIL and HATEFUL group of people that i consider to be a cult.”

And you couldn’t find the ADL website?

Judging by your grammar and punctuation, I’d guess you’re in high school or junior high. Just make sure that you spell the website url right when you present your little report. Some of your classmates or your teacher might be better educated and less guilt-stricken than you, and wish to visit.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 21, 2008 at 5:45 pm

Velibor,

I was vocally opposed to the 1999 attack on Serbia, which we White Nationalists viewed as an attempt to force multiculturalism on the people of Yugoslavia, as well as an unwarranted violation of your sovereignty. To be frank more of my sympathies lie with the Croats, but I’d side with you Serbs over the Muslims, any day. Some day America will “Balkanize”as well, and we’ll be in the same position you guys are in, I anticipate. Until then, you have our sympathies.

Comment from David Jansen
Time November 24, 2008 at 11:27 am

There are many differences between the White and Black race besides color. Their skulls are thicker than ours and their brains are smaller. They have a differernt body smell. Their smell is simular to apes. That is probably because they are decendants of apes. They have longer arms than Whites by proportion. As far as intelligence? Look around you. Almost everything you see and use was invented by caucasians. What have they invented? For centuries, while the rest of the world progressed, the black Africans didn’t progress at all. They never built a ship to travel. They still lived as they had for centuries, in grass huts, living like savages, being cannibals, hunting with primitive weapons. They had small vocabularies. They were mostly of moronic intelligence. Most still are. They were slaves of their own people and brought here as slaves. The intelligence they possess now is mostly inherited from a White person some where in their history. They get diseases we don’t. AID oringinated in Africa, orinially contacted from monkies. I don’t know if it was from eating them or having sex from them. They are more violent than other races. They commit 75% of the violent crime in this county, even though they are only 12% of this country. They commit many more rapes than Whites. There are many differences besides skin color. Their culture is totally different. They think different than we. They are easily amused. And the pinis thing is a myth.

Comment from Celt
Time November 29, 2008 at 12:54 pm

If you look at the science and leave “God” out of it, reading the legends in the Bible and other religious texts as if they are stories explaining the unexplainable to those earlier peoples, it is clear that the human species was altered by a third party or parties. With only three basic races, Negroids are clearly the control group. I believe in evolution to a point, then there was intervention.

I have not read the research on this or any other “white” site. I have read many religious texts and follow scientific discoveries - with an open logical mind.

In regard to women, are you the barefoot-pregnant school, or do you respect women like Anne Pressly with a mind and a career?

As for LRPD, it is DISPATCH that is racist. If you get a black dispatcher, IF a unit is dispatched, they get misdirected to the wrong, but nearby, location, giving suspects plenty of time to escape or hide evidence. If the dispatcher is white, more than one unit is sent, fast and accurate. Is that because the black dispatchers are:
a. too stupid to relay the correct information?
b. racists delaying response to any white caller for any reason?
c. getting kickbacks from the criminals involved?
d. not taking the threat of violence seriously because there is so much violence in black culture?
e. assuming the suspect is black and “givin’ a brotha a break?”

This has happened enough times that it is not random. The black dispatchers get pissed when you call back because it’s been 30 minutes and no unit has arrived.

Criminals are trash, regardless of color.
If the dispatcher is black, count on getting zero or slow response from LRPD.

Comment from billy roper
Time November 29, 2008 at 2:11 pm

That’s an interesting idea…if a third party seeded or influenced the human evolutionary process, as insinuated in the film “2001″, for example, the least evolved race would be considered the “control group”. Could have been.

White Revolution wishes that the economic realty of our society was such that more women could be mothers, and more mothers could stay home with their children, but we are realistic in recognizing that it often takes two incomes to run a household, these days. We respect women who have to balance their career and home. It’s very difficult, and certainly not ideal. So, while we are not adherents to the, as you put it, “barefoot and pregnant” mindset, we do think that when possible traditional gender roles are healthiest for families and children. Our female members and officers agree.

Comment from Celt
Time November 30, 2008 at 8:37 am

I agree that mothers should be able to stay home with their children if they so choose, assuming the father is respectful, responsible, and economically sound. Some choose to not have children, being unable to find a suitable father. This culture has not supported children being involved in daily life since the industrial revolution (except for child labor/abuse in those times), and does not really support intelligent motherhood. What I see now are children who lack the social graces or even common courtesy, as their parents have none either. The last example I saw were white parents, but I’ve seen it in other races. The common thread is a lack of responsibility for one’s own actions and how one’s actions impact others.

Comment from B Kesel
Time December 1, 2008 at 11:04 pm

I think it is high time that the white race stood up for itself. The pendulum has swung the other way & we are now the minority. Why can’t we have our version of NAACP, Miss White America, etc, etc. I’m sorry but it’s about time to say it like it is!

Comment from Velibor Milinkovic
Time December 4, 2008 at 12:46 pm

Billy, I think that territorial integrity of Croatia must be respected, but at the same time i think that republic Srpska must be independent from Bosnia and rejoin Serbia, and the Croat part of Bosnia must be independent and be part of Croatia, well Bosnian Muslims are white but they’re Croats and Serbs converted to Islam and they don’t have european country, now Croats and Serbs are endangered again; Bosniaks birth rate is higher, Billy, one of the reasons for the independence of Montenegro is leaving Serbia without outlet to the sea; it is understandable European Union and the U.S. promoted independence of Montenegro (they are serbians), they deny independence of Republic Srpska (serbian orthodox don’t want to live under muslim opression, they also deny the independence of South Ossetia an Aryan people descent of that ancient nation Scythians which has absolutely nothing to do with Georgia (Georgians are related ethnically with Chechens, not religiously), here in Serbia we don’t want problems with Croatia, the real problem is Bosnia and Kosovo, Kosovo is the craddle of Serbia when Turkish took power of Kosovo they imported Muslim Albanians later their higher birthrate surpassed Serbs, this is something that I feel that is happening with Mexicans in some parts of the U.S., you know even we have been atacked by U.S. forces we are not terrorists, we don’t have suicide killers, while Bosniaks and Albanians which have been suported by thev U.S. betray you, here in the Balkans everyboby knows that Al-Qaeda has cells operating in Kosovo and the Muslim part of Bosnia and there are arab and turk mujahideens there and the rest of he world wants to ignore it, by other hand I think that Barack Obama is very dangeours, apart of having African descent, he has a muslim background, it does not help Serbia and Croatia to much, Obama has muslim parents (uncles, aunts, grandfathers, cousins etc), therefore he has sympathies for Islam and this is very dangerous for the U.S. and the world.
Billy, I have some questions for you, Don’t you think that republic Srpska must be independent from Bosnia and rejoin Serbia?, Don’t you think that the Croatian part of Bosnia must be independent from Bosnia and be territory of Croatia?, Do you oppose Turkey joining European Union?. How would you stop Mexican inmigration into the U.S. and avoiding another Kosovo?
I want also to make a comment: I don’t want your country to be ‘Balkanized’, we need a strong U.S. for protecting White Christian countries all over the world, Europe is also suffering inmigration mainly from Africa, the Caribbean and Arab and muslim countries, the craddle of White race is disappearing. I want to express my sympathies for your movement, Europe needs from the U.S., U.S. is the great son of Europe.

Comment from Dusty
Time December 4, 2008 at 1:54 pm

Working in the construction industry of 37 years and dealing with all types of people I can tell you that 95% of ALL blacks are so stupid and ignorant it’s amazing they even survive at all. Of course, they ALL claim racism in one way or the other and so they get their way. Mexicans are over coming the USA. I get, on average, 2 phone calls a week telling me I should hire them, (illegals) and they will save me money, work harder and I can pay them less. It’s amazing. However, I am a total devoted white American that loves my country up until 11-4-08. Now, I am scared to death of what will happen. My account tells me that I am going to have to lay off most of my crew, cut back on my most of my machinery, become way smaller and make way less money, own nothing actually in order to survive that black bastard’s new tax laws he and the rest of those total looser left wing supporting liars are going to impose. I am actually looking and trying to find another decent country to take my money and life to. I am a nervous wreck. And for all of you that voted for and put this total looser in our “white” house, you deserve every single solitary thing that he gives you. The rest of us do NOT.

Comment from BLACK POWER
Time December 4, 2008 at 2:37 pm

fuck yall

Comment from billy roper
Time December 5, 2008 at 2:08 am

I don’t claim to understand all the highly complex ethnic, religious, and cultural differences between the contending factions in the former Yugoslavia as well as someone who lives there. I do understand the differences between Croats, Serbs, and Muslims. Basically we support every White group being united with those who are most similar to themselves. That means that we would support Orthodox Serbs being together, even if that meant supporting Pan-Slavism, and Croats and their co-nationalists being together. Many White Nationalists here in the U.S. don’t understand that a lot of the Muslims in Yugoslavia are racially White, even though their ancestors were forced to convert to Islam. It’s easy for us to say that race is all that matters, since we don’t have as deep or bitter religious differences as you guys do (Catholics vs. Orthodox vs. Muslim). Of course many feel that the Croats are most like us culturally, and in terms of using the same alphabet, lol. But the Serbian people are worthy of respect and we support your wishes for self-determination, and understand your desire to protect your own ethnic minorities which aren’t geographically connected to the Serbian majority area.

We don’t think that Turkey should be allowed in the European Union, no.

Unfortunately there’s very little chance that the U.S. will be able to survive as it currently exists, and so Balkanization is probably inevitable, for us. The portion of our land we are able to hang onto and purify will be a much more staunch ally and friend of Whites around the world, though, than we ever have been.

So, to those who are thinking of becoming expatriots and moving to other countries, I say, let us stand and fight for the land our ancestors discovered, colonized, and fought to civilize. As Robert Matthews said, “for the graves of our sires”…and for the future of our children.

Comment from GW in AR
Time December 6, 2008 at 4:11 pm

I’ve read patiently, Angel’s text. How do these people hang to their propoganda? Angel should drive down to inner city America at night and exercize some of her multi-cultural love. They sure would. I think a lot of people think that back in 1950 us “sutherners” use to ride around looking for a poor black farm boy to rape and lynce. Da@# Ted Koppel, Allen Combs,…they are the epitomy of what has portray southern Christians of my childhood as “HATERS”. I grew up in South Arkansas. Racism was almost non-existant to us. I know,…I know,… they say,…well that’s they. We co-existed in seperate communities, we didn’t go to church together, we didn’t eat together, we didn’t go to school together, and we damn sure didn’t sleep together. That doesn’t mean we “hated” them. We did our thing, and they did theirs. Obtrution into either side was looked down on and shuned. Spike Lee says, “Leave it to Beaver” families had it made, but “everybody” else was screwed. Well, to me now, Leave to Beaver is gone, Andy Griffith style towns are gone, Bonanza’s, Little House on the Prarie, style families are gone, so do we see the Black Family risen from the ashes of such opressian. Give me a break Angel, the one thing I am sorry for the white race is 30 years ago we decided to subdue our known truths and let you liberal, brotherly love types railroad us down the road of ruin. I don’t care what the neo-cons, liberals, PHd’s and politcally correct things say…we tried it…it ain’t workin’.

Comment from Kristin
Time December 7, 2008 at 5:34 am

Let me tell you something. I left America 2 years ago because I couldn’t take living amongst black people anymore. They are the majority of criminals. I am an attractive, blue eyed blond woman and the whiter you are , the more black people can’t stand you. I never felt safe in America and it makes me sick how those lazy apes have destroyed once beautiful neighborhoods. I live in Tokyo now. 98% of all people here are Japanese. You can’t believe the harmony here and the low, low crime, all because the Japanese don’t like mixing races or allowing immigrants in the country. I am welcome here , being a Euro American woman, but most other breeds are not so, although they are silent about it. Tokyo should be a case study on how lack of racial diversity makes a country safe. And I won’t be back to America until whites are back on top of the world.

Comment from Dan
Time December 7, 2008 at 3:32 pm

Wow Kristin you have some high self esteem issues “attractive, blue eyed blond woman” LMAO. Speaking of immigrants, you are considered an immigrant in Tokyo, and Japanese don;t like mixing races? What? I know more black men with Japanese women then i could count. But thank god you left America, because obviously you don’t belong here.

Comment from Kristin
Time December 8, 2008 at 7:33 am

High self esteem issues, LMAO. I am confident, and rightly so, let me guess, you’re a brown on brown little turd? Thought so….obviously you don’t live in Japan and don’t know jack about the real deal here. There are a handful of black people in a city of 12 million. Thank God for that !

Comment from Josh
Time December 8, 2008 at 2:14 pm

Kristin, if the American government did something that the Japaness did not like, do you think that they would still treat you the same?

Comment from billy roper
Time December 9, 2008 at 3:52 am

We understand that the Japanese are a proud people who abhor multiracialism. However, we believe that White Americans should stand and fight in and for our own country, rather than immigrate to another, whether White majority, or not.

Comment from Jamie
Time December 12, 2008 at 11:13 am

But this is not “Your Country” This is the Native American’s that the White Europeans took from them… since you want to start claiming stuff that whites NEVER owned in the first place. What you need to do is just live your life and move on cause as much as you think that blacks, and hispanics and whatever other races you feel are not on your level are stupid and are ape like they are not going anywhere… And if you really think about it…colored people built this country and most whites just sat there lazy ass down and didn’t not do SHIT!!! White europeans took Africans from certain areas in African because they knew that these people are the ones that could do the jobs that the WHITES could NOT DO….How you like dem Apples??? LOL

Comment from David Jansen
Time December 13, 2008 at 2:03 pm

I can’t believe there are such ignorant people as Jamie. The negoes did not build this country. They picked cotton and did only farm labor. White men built this country. Yes, we took it away from the Native Americans, but we built the building, streets, houses etc. not negroes. Not Mexicans either. As I have previously stated, everything you see around you was invented by White men. Without us there would be no electricity, no car and trucks, no airplanes, no medicines for most of the illinesses, and the list goes on. We are the most intelligent race in the world. The Native Americans would still be living in tents and hunting with bows and arrows. Living primitive, just like the black Africans. The slave brought here were already slaves of their own people in Aftrica. They were purchased from the larger tribe leaders. So enjoy your car, your plane trips, you music you hear on a radio, even the furniture you sit your dumb ass on, the vitamins you take, the medicines etc. the list goes on and on. All of those luxuries and necessities you use were all invented my the great White race. How do you like those apples?

Comment from Marnia
Time December 13, 2008 at 3:28 pm

First of all…the report came out a while ago and it said that white people are a mutation! The real origination of people came from the lands surrounding the equator! and guess who stays around the equator ya’ll…BLACK FOLK!!!!! And other people of color! I have heard your story and even read your article, but the bottom line is…you are fighting a losing battle! We have a black president now and there is nothing that you or anyone else can do about it! And if you want to be technical…he was the better man for the job and he is both white and black! hmmmm…lets think about this for a second Mr. Roper….so the 43rd president elect is half a white man and half a black man and he is intelligent and smart and a fantastic candidate! He is the hope of this country! This predicts what actually might happen if races in our country can come together! If we stop thinking that one race is better than another and embrace each other…look at the advances we could make. White is not enough and neither is black! It’s the 2 together that make the difference…this is how we experience CHANGE! And if you think it cant be done…YES WE/IT CAN!!!!!!

Comment from Matt
Time December 13, 2008 at 4:49 pm

I agree with Jamie. Anyone who believes the stupid shit on this website is a dumb ignorant shithead. Grow up.

Comment from billy roper
Time December 14, 2008 at 12:26 pm

So-called “Native Americans” first took this land from other people, White people, and slaughtered them by overwhelming them by sheer numbers. Then, for thousands of years they carried out a stone age existence, warring and feuding and torturing and slaughtering each other and committing horrific acts of genocide and cannibalism on each other, until Whites came.

One could well ask the surviving”Native Americans” if they would be content to live as their ancestors did, in squalor, dirt, and abject stone age poverty, without Whites.

Likewise, one could ask blacks if they would prefer that their ancestors had been left in Africa to become another tribes’ lunch, there.

Saying that neither White nor Black is enough, and that a mulatto is better, is like saying that a Clydesdale isn’t strong enough to pull a plow, it should be bred with a shetland pony, or that a bloodhound doesn’t have a good enough nose to catch a scent, so it should be bred with a chihuahua. Come on.

Black Invention Myths:
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

Comment from billy roper
Time December 14, 2008 at 12:31 pm

Marnia,

Mutations are how evolution occur. More primitive forms of life do not mutate, or evolve. The original form of life that crawled out of the primordial sea for the first time was a mutation, too. Aren’t you glad there are such mutations, which keep evolution going?

Thanks for helping to back up my point. I’m SO glad you agree that blacks are more primitive and unevolved than Whites.

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time December 14, 2008 at 3:46 pm

I have to throw in my two cents on this ignorant notion that through misceganation (I know this is a big word for most of you multicultists but try looking it up) the world will be a better place. Throughout history many many civilizations have crumbled at the hands of misceganation. Egypt is the greatest example of a White civlization crumbling because the White ruling class eventually mixed with the blacks. Is Egypt a better place now because of this? Is it some sort of multicultural utopia? No and far from it. This concept of the mixing of races is nothing new to the pages of history. The question you have to ask yourself is whether you will be a fool and allow history to repeat itself or learn from the pages of history and try to create a better and different future for generations to come.

First of all…the report came out a while ago and it said that white people are a mutation! The real origination of people came from the lands surrounding the equator! and guess who stays around the equator ya’ll…BLACK FOLK!!!!! And other people of color! I have heard your story and even read your article, but the bottom line is…you are fighting a losing battle! We have a black president now and there is nothing that you or anyone else can do about it! And if you want to be technical…he was the better man for the job and he is both white and black! hmmmm…lets think about this for a second Mr. Roper….so the 43rd president elect is half a white man and half a black man and he is intelligent and smart and a fantastic candidate! He is the hope of this country! This predicts what actually might happen if races in our country can come together! If we stop thinking that one race is better than another and embrace each other…look at the advances we could make. White is not enough and neither is black! It’s the 2 together that make the difference…this is how we experience CHANGE! And if you think it cant be done…YES WE/IT CAN!!!!!!

Comment from Matt
Time December 14, 2008 at 11:35 pm

You’re a moron. Egypt has never been white (even when it was successful). They have always been mixed. Look at the hyrogliths on the wall you dumbass.

Comment from billy roper
Time December 15, 2008 at 11:48 am

Yes indeed, let’s look at them:
http://www.white-history.com/hwr8c.htm

“The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.” (‘The Ra Expeditions’, Thor Heyerdahl, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971, p.249)

“A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a vivid blue-green color of eyes.” (‘A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the British Museum’, London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49)

“The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.” (‘Tutankhamen, The Golden Monarch’, Michael Carter, N.Y. 1972 p.68)

“Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.” (‘Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt’, Henry George Tomkins, Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII, 1889, p.216)

“A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored ones.” (‘L’Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale’, De Lapouge, G. Vacher,. Paris, Pichat, 1899, p.26)

“Amenhotep III’s tomb painting shows him as having light red hair.” (‘Ancient Egypt, Discovering its Splendors’, National Geographic Society, 1978 p.103)

“An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.” (‘Life of the Ancient Egyptians’, Eugen Strouhal, Norman, Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53)

“A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word “wedjat” means “blue” in Egyptian. Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and blond hair.” (‘Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil’, E.T. Hamy, Bulletin de la Societe d’Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739)

“Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red hair and blue eyes.” (‘Historia del Arte Vol III’, Jose Pijoan, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932, plate XI)

“The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.”(‘Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne’, H. Champollion, Marseille, Musee Boreby, 1973 p.94)

“A painting from Iteti’s tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking man with blond hair.” (‘Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient Egypt’, Wolfhart Westendorf, New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65)

Comment from Ryan
Time December 15, 2008 at 4:47 pm

I don’t want to write a hateful message, but I am quite saddened and disheartened by the content in this website. I am a white male teenager living in a racially accepting town. I have been involved with an exchange program in Saltillo, Mexico as well as having many African American and Hispanic friends. The people I have met in Mexico as well as the African Americans that I know are quite possibly some of the most intelligent and nice people I’ve ever met. You say that other races are less intelligent than whites. I don’t see how that explains why one of my friends in Mexico is going to be a neurologist and graduated at the top of his class in a nearly all white institution. Your basis for hatred seems to be at scientific evidence, but I assure you, no scientific evidence could ever make me hate anyone. As for the religious aspect, I am not religious, nor have I ever been to church, but I do believe in God. What I would like to say is that no matter what says in the Bible, if God is what I think he is he would never discriminate or judge his creations based on the concentration of melanin in one’s skin. Overall, this website has shown me that not everyone has a mind that is as openminded as mine and that there are people that are scared of change and difference.

Comment from billy roper
Time December 15, 2008 at 8:35 pm

Here are some sources you might find educational on the issue of racial differences in IQ:

http://mangans.blogspot.com/2005/04/racial-iq-differences.html

Racial Differences in Intelligence: What Mainstream
Science Says
http://www.cpsimoes.net/artigos/bell_mainstr.html

Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic
http://www.news-medical.net/?id=9530

Comment from billy roper
Time December 15, 2008 at 8:54 pm

Are you sure that you’re a white male? You sound like a little girl. A very uneducated, pathetic little girl.

Here’s the reality of what life is like in Mexico:
http://whiterevolution.com/?p=460

When Whites found the native Mexicans, some were cutting out their neighbors’ hearts in human sacrificial rituals. Others were having their hearts cut out by their neighbors. All of them are better off because of Whites.

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time December 15, 2008 at 11:08 pm

Uhmm, who is the dumbass now? You are more than willing to insert your foot in your mouth at any time. You anti-White punks will never learn will you. No matter how hard you try to deny it we will ALWAYS have the TRUTH on our side.

Comment from Matt | [e]
Time December 14, 2008 at 11:35 pm

You’re a moron. Egypt has never been white (even when it was successful). They have always been mixed. Look at the hyrogliths on the wall you dumbass.

Comment from Ryan
Time December 16, 2008 at 5:32 pm

I’m upset that I ever wrote anything on the website, because the so called leader of this organization can do nothing but insult me. I have an opinion that is different than you and you can do nothing but call me a little girl. If you read my first post again you’ll realize that I never said anything insulting to you. Thank’s for the info on life in Mexico, but I have lived for at least a week in every Mexican province and am proficient in Spanish and mexico isn’t filled with the propaganda you try to preach. I’ve been exposed to many different people and they are not all conspiring to start some genocide. And you have no right to call me uneducated when I have the ability to be openminded and apparently you and your group lack that capability.

Comment from billy roper
Time December 16, 2008 at 6:33 pm

The reason why I said that you sound like a little girl is that, por ejemplo, you state that you get upset because someone insults you…not in itself a very masculine quality. That, and that the fact that you value your own personal experience with individual persons who are exceptions to the rule (of racial inequality) and your “openmindedness” more than you value the weight of scientific and historical evidence, psychologically, is a feminine trait.

Yes, you’re very openminded. Try filling it with something other than your emotions and feelings.

Let’s try this. Why, in your opinion, is there such a difference in development between Central America and North America?

Both regions have similar natural resources. I think that the differences are due to the racial makeup of the people of those regions.

Secondly, do you think that an America which is more like Mexico would be an improvement, for our country?

Whites make up between 10% to 17% of the Mexican population, depending on how one measures it. Seventy-five percent are Mestizo, or mixed, and about 12% are pure Indio. And who is it that keeps their economy and infrastructure going in Mexico, to the extent that it does? Not the Indios. Not even the Mestizos. It’s the White minority there.

Comment from Kinga Haiti
Time December 17, 2008 at 7:59 pm

I’m a black inmigrant from Haiti, i live in New Orleans, I was a teacher of History in Haiti now I teach Haitian and African history, ok I accept that you whites surpass blacks on IQ, but what can you tell me about Neil deGrasse Tyson, people are saying that he is a genius, Is he a genius?, Has he discovered something on Astronomics?, or is he only a T.V. anchor?, if he is a genius then all humans are equal, or he has white blood or what?, what can you say about his color, is lighter than the rest of blacks?, answer me Billy as you unveiled Black Invention Myths, tell us about Neil deGrasse Tyson, is only a T.V. anchor?

Comment from one mad girl
Time December 17, 2008 at 8:10 pm

this is a really crazy website i am an 13year old black girl having to deal with these racial comments from who ever billy ropper is and that is ashame that i have to go threw this with whit people and black people go back and forth with each other it dosent make any sense and I thought Martin Luther King made it clear but i guess not so all of you white Folk who hatin or mad of us black people can get a life and yeah for you billy whateva your last name is it says no where in the bible of the christian that god wanted us seprated so there you have if you would read the bible then you probably would have more knowledge then you do now and I dont understan why yall call us niggers because we not and if we called yall whitefolks how dat make you feel huh? Grow up and get a life and then you will see why there are black people on the earth and its not like we put the color on our skin because we didnt and you really acting like white people were the first on the earth because acoording to my caculation no one nows and please stop thinking that black people are the only ones that comment crimes because White people do it to so any more comments

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time December 17, 2008 at 9:30 pm

Jesus Ryan are you going to cry like a little girl now??? Wow we seem to be getting an influx of really sensitive multicultists. That really shouldn’t surprise me though since multicultists base virtually all logic on emotions.

Comment from Ryan | [e]
Time December 16, 2008 at 5:32 pm

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time December 17, 2008 at 9:43 pm

Please tell me you are seriosuly not a teacher. Your spelling is horrible. How is it that just because you can possibly point out one black genius, that somehow makes everyone equal? Don’t you get it yet, NO two men are completely equal. No two people contribute equally to society. Thus making equality nothing more than a man made myth. Every man and woman has different abilities that they excell at better than others. Your excelled ability apparently seems to be teaching Haitian History. Though I can’t imagine their is much more to Haitian history than the killing of all the White French people on your island and voodoo but hey whatever. If you can make it into some sort of curriculum then good for you.

Comment from Kinga Haiti | [e]
Time December 17, 2008 at 7:59 pm

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time December 17, 2008 at 9:54 pm

Yes one mad girl Martin Luther King Jr. made it completly clear the night before he was assasinated, when he was recorded on a FBI wiretap beating a White prostitute while screaming to the heavans he was Not A Nigger Tonight, that he was indeed a hypocrite and didn’t really believe in equality either. The true agenda of The Beast As Saint became very clear to many of us on that night. Now go be a good little negress and read some more hooked on ebonics books. They are doing wonders for your edumacation.

Comment from one mad girl | [e]
Time December 17, 2008 at 8:10 pm

Comment from billy roper
Time December 18, 2008 at 1:19 am

Neil Degrasse Tyson certainly isn’t fully black, as this picture of him should make clear to everyone:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson

I’d estimate he’s at least half White.

How many astrophysicists did Black culture produce in their native environmment, without the benefit of White genetic admixture, White technology, White science, and White educations??…Oh, I forgot, Blacks never emerged from the stone age on their own.

Tyson was given a preferred placement into Harvard to fill their racial quota, and as a nonWhite, was advanced into the PhD. program at Columbia. I bet he’s glad that his black ancestors didn’t stay in Africa, or that they don’t run the world, considering how much he’s benefited from the generosity of Whites. But, it’s nice that you have a token mullato Uncle Tom to hold us an exception to the overwhelming evidence of black inferiority. Next you’ll trot out a genuine negro jet pilot.

Tell me, teacher, were you one of the blacks looting and robbing in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina?

Here’s an article about how White people were massacred by blacks in your native Haiti:

http://kentuckyannatruenews.blogspot.com/2008/12/haiti-once-was-white-and-flourishing.html

Comment from billy roper
Time December 18, 2008 at 1:44 am

“it says no where in the bible of the christian that god wanted us seprated so there you have if you would read the bible then you probably would have more knowledge then you do now..”

Well, since you brought it up…

Deuteronomy 22:9: “Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with divers seeds: lest the fruit of thy seed which thou hast sown, and the fruit of thy vineyard, be defiled.”

And he made from one every nation of men to live on the face of the earth, having determined their allotted periods and the boundaries of their habitations. (Acts 17:26)

But in the cities of these people that the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and Jebusites, . . . (Deuteronomy 20:10-18)

You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but shall love your neighbor as yourself… (Leviticus 19:18)

As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are round about you.
You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with you and their families that are with you, who have been born in your land; and they may be your property.
You may bequeath them to your sons after you, to inherit as a possession forever; you may make slaves of them, but over your brethren the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another, with harshness. (Leviticus 25:44-46)

And When the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them, thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them;
Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. . . .(Deuteronomy 7:2-6)

. . . I am the Lord your God which have separated you from other people. (Leviticus 20:24)

. . . Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude. (Nehemiah 13:3)

Comment from Kinga Haiti
Time December 18, 2008 at 11:56 am

About Neil deGrasse Tyson, well, it’s evident that his color is lighter than Africans, In Africa he could be considered white, but that article doesn’t mention any white ancestry and I don’t understand why, I didn’t commit any crime during Katrina hurricane I was teaching slavery history in France but I was insulted and discriminated by some French, I couldn’t withstand it and I came to America.

Comment from one mad girl
Time December 18, 2008 at 8:03 pm

listen here chris if you would read I said I was 13years old and no I am not about to cry and Martin Luther King did not say that so why dont you get you some educational books white boy and like I said I am not a nigger just because I am black dosen’t mean that I am an nigga old ugly white boy every black person not from New Orleans so you can get your self straight. You white trash now who you calling nigga.

Comment from billy roper
Time December 19, 2008 at 1:30 am

http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/25676-what-you-may-not-know-about-dr-martin-luther-king

The burden of this post will be to examine the discussion of this facet of King’s life given by Rev. Michael Eric Dyson in a book summarized elsewhere. Page numbers in parentheses refer to that work.

“From his teens, King enjoyed sharp suits and light-­skinned women” (193). His exploits in college led to him and a friend being nicknamed after an Atlanta wrecking company: King bragged “we wreck all the women.” Later, in seminary [!] and graduate school, King’s seduction of women was aided by a dapper wardrobe and possession of a new car. (Someone: follow the money for us.) His addiction to sex was such that he even cheated on Coretta after they were engaged. This was in the 1940’s and 50’s, before the sexual revolution on college campuses, before coed dorms and the Pill.

Later, after he had become a professional demonstrator and speech-giver, it was claimed that he had a girl in every town (194).

When King went to Oslo in 1964 to receive the Nobel Prize, a gaggle of Scandinavian bimbettes serviced him and his entourage but then stole their wallets (194). (The assistants got their share of action by promising access to the Man himself.) King & Co. decided not to press charges because of the potential negative publicity that might be cast on his “cause”.

According to his close associate Abernathy, King had three girls in succession the very night before he was killed (155). At least one was a white girl, and as King felt orgasm approaching he shouted “I’m not a Negro tonight!” (163)

Why did Abernathy spill the beans? Some have suggested jealousy (156). The FBI had tapes, not just of King’s trysts, but of full-scale orgies in his hotel rooms. It appears that King and Abernathy sodomized each other. Dyson quotes Carl Rowan as explaining the evidence away in that black men alone with each other “talk” that way, so that the tape does not prove that sodomy actually took place (164). Note however that in the background the sounds of another couple groaning can be heard, so that the orgy either included another fudge-packing pair, or there were women present, in which case the claim about how male Negroes talk amongst themselves already needs modification.

Enough. There is no possible justification for lowering ourselves into this filth, except that we as a nation are asked collectively to honor a man of this character for a whole day every year.

Dyson is embarrassed by King’s perversion, yet also makes excuses for it that I now turn to.

1. King’s adultery is mitigated by the fact that he sometimes shouted out God’s name as orgasm approached.

Instead of bringing his duties and desires into conflict, King momentarily fused them…At the height of his infidelity, King calls God’s name in vain to bless his fleshly frolic as a way to call attention to his paradoxical predicament: by invoking the divine presence, he is both seeking sanction and inviting scorn on his divided soul. Even though he is breaking God’s law in committing adultery, his reckless invocation of God is at once profane and the ultimate predicate of his existence. No matter what, King’s theology reminds him that God “promised never to leave me, never to leave me alone.” (162f.)

First, Dyson does not know that some kind of piety was the cause of King’s shouting the name of God during his excitement: this is wishful thinking. But second, sensing the presence of God during willful and persistent sin is not a mitigation. For the regenerate, it may be an inducement to repentance — a repentance that we see no evidence for in King’s life. For the unregenerate, it is simply a sign of extreme hardness (Heb 12:17).

2. King’s separation from home heightened the temptation, and the need for this was whitey’s fault

In the comparative moral context in which we inevitably view history, their sins were far less grievous than the racial apartheid that led figures like King to spend most of the year away from home, making them more vulnerable to their weaknesses. White supremacy didn’t cause their sins, but it surely gave King and others ample opportunity to succumb to temptations that they may have otherwise been spared. (157)

And not just separation, but escaping the “heat of white hatred”:

King’s desperate hedonism was also a profound gesture of sanity making as he sought release into the forbidden realm of erotic excess as an escape from the unbearable heat of white hatred. It was perhaps a convoluted way of keeping in touch with his own flesh — flesh that was being ransomed to redeem racial justice as a condition of his commitment to black freedom. (162f.)

However, as Dyson’s honesty itself is forced to concede, King’s pattern of sexual promiscuity was already established before he ever hit the road for racial justice (161).

The biblical ethic is more direct, however. Very clearly, if a man cannot take up a cause without it causing him to fall into deep and unavoidable sin, then he ought not to take up that cause.

Let’s state the matter even more bluntly. We are talking about crusades, not to end child pornography, but to end “separate but equal” bathrooms and drinking fountains and such. It is easy to forget this in all the long-faced pontificating and moralizing about the King crusades.

It is simply not possible to excuse chronic adultery in terms of the need to march for the divine right to share a bathroom or a drinking fountain.

3. King was “pure in heart” even if bodily impure

If King was pure, it was in the biblical sense of being “pure in heart’ — that is, obsessively single-minded about the greatest good; loving God and one’s neighbor. King was so committed to that good that he died for it… (158)

First of all, King did not “die for it.” He was shot by someone.

Second, King David was identified as “pure in heart” long before the Bathsheba episode. If David can (as I think) be identified as such afterward, it was in spite of the sin, and exemplified by the depth of his remorse and repentance when confronted with his sin by Nathan. Dyson presents no evidence that King was repentant in a life-changing way.

4. Fornication is common in ministerial circles

Rev. Dyson’s theologico-sexual confusion here is already obliquely evident in his use of the feminine pronoun in references to God (182, 193). But consider what he says: “King was certainly reared in a preacherly culture where good sex is pursued with nearly the same fervor as believers seek to be filled with the Holy Ghost” (157). And earlier:

While black ministers rail against the sexual deviance of rappers, teen mothers, and gays and lesbians, they often fail to confront the rituals of seduction they practice from the pulpit. Bedding women is nearly a sport in some churches. (135)

God help us!

Lest the suspicion arise that this is a Negro thing, he points to Jim Baker and Jimmy Swaggart (135). But that is quite preposterous. Both those men were disciplined by the Assemblies of God, whereupon they simply left that group. In fact, white churches that still claim the gospel do not tolerate this kind of behavior in ministers. Consider this section from the form of government of the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA):

When a minister, pending a trial, shall make confession, if the matter be base and flagitious, such as drunkenness, uncleanness, or crimes of a greater nature, however penitent he may appear to the satisfaction of all, the court shall without delay impose definite suspension or depose him from the ministry. (Book of Church Order, 34-7).

It is not legalistic to suggest that ministers should be held to a moral standard that makes behavior such as King’s unthinkable. Justification by faith does not negate minimum levels of sanctification for ministers: Titus 1:5-16 is nothing less than that.

To be sure, it is hard to talk about this kind of thing without lapsing into self-righteousness. We can indeed say, “but for the grace of God, there go I.” But it is also true that a man should not be a minister absent the grace of God. If the kind of situation that Dyson describes as being typical and widespread in the Negro church is indeed the case, and if nothing is done about it, we cannot say that it is a church at all any more. Let Martin Luther King, Jr. serve as a scarecrow for how bad things can sink. It can reach a point that even such a wicked man can be extolled by men who are regarded as part of the holy catholic church of Christ. A nation can sink so low as to honor such a man with a hol

Comment from billy roper
Time December 19, 2008 at 1:37 am

Well, good for the French, if they haven’t all become indoctrinated with White guilt syndrome through wave after wave of back-colonization. I think last years’ riots of nonWhites there might have awakened many of them. They might avoid a “Camp Of The Saints” scenario, after all.

http://www.white-history.com/euroauscrime.htm

As the influx of North Africans into France has continued unabated, the issues of immigration and race relations have became important issues in France. High unemployment and several violent incidents in non-White communities heightened hostility toward non-White immigrants, resulted in the growth of an anti-immigrant party, the Front National.

The huge numbers of Muslims in France have created a serious security problem for that country, with Islamic extremists almost having a free run, being able to hide amongst the large Arab and North African population with relative ease. As a result France has been rocked by Islamic terrorism since 1995. In addition to this, huge swathes of Parisian suburbs have turned into non-White gangland areas, marked by extreme social deprivation and crime.

In October 2005, a wave of non-White rioting hit France, perpetrated by North African gangs across the country. Thousands of cars were burned, and at least one person was killed in the unrest. However, as the pictures below show, the 2005 riots were not an isolated incident, but in fact part of pattern that has grown along with the increasing non-White population.

Comment from Stanislaw Zewlakow
Time December 22, 2008 at 2:11 pm

Blacks have low I.Q., blacks are ugly, black girls are the most unattractive in the world, The Williams sisters are the Gorilla sisters, the other day I was watching a match between one of the sister Williams and Maria Sharapova, it’s incredible the difference, that Williams sister looks like a monkey girl and Sharapova looks like a Goddess, a real beauty, a perfection of woman, fortunately Maria Sharapova defeated the gorilla girl, black girls are fully unattractive, Thank god that in Poland there are not blacks.

Comment from JON KIRK
Time December 24, 2008 at 7:06 am

IT IS TIME! A NIGGER RUNS THIS BEAUTIFUL LAND OF OURS, WE MUST TURN THIS NATION AROUND, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!

Comment from A Proud BLACK MAN
Time January 9, 2009 at 9:32 pm

This site is so racist,but am not even going to get mad.My president is BLACK.
dumb ass crackers….my girlfriends white lol

Comment from billy roper
Time January 10, 2009 at 9:41 pm

Your President is a mulatto…what one might call a “high yellow”. Yes, this site is racist, and proudly so. It’s also racist to use the term “crackers”, but that kind of logic is probably beyond your mental capabilities.
***************************
Racism study finds people indifferent to slurs, overt bias

Posted: 09 Jan 2009 12:02 AM CST

Despite what they think they would do, people are remarkably blase when actually confronted with blatant racism, a new study shows.

Canadian researchers who tested people’s reactions to anti-black comments found a surprisingly high tolerance for racial slurs — including “one of the most offensive words in the English language.”

Not only did people not get as upset as people predicted they would, the slur didn’t influence their willingness to choose a white racist as a partner to solve a word puzzle.

In fact, people preferred the white over the black person who was the target of the slur.

Comment from Shinigami
Time January 11, 2009 at 10:47 pm

.I’m mexican.HAHAHAHa We mexicans are taking over and theirs nothing you white trash can do.HAHAHA We will take your jobs and send the money we make to MExico and mexico will be better than the US.F*ck the US.MExico!!!!

Comment from White Cali. Born Proud
Time January 11, 2009 at 11:05 pm

I am 30 years old. I have lived in California for nearly all my life. I have whitnessed the plague that america calls immigration. I have watched it leech into the community like a sewage leak into a clean source of drinking water. I have seen the decay it has caused over the decades.
I am a gormet chef. I am a PC analist. I am a struggling white american born individual. And I struggle because I am unable to work.
Spics get paid less to do the jobs I wanted to do. Therefore I am unable to compete with anyone hispanic. I am hateful and angry at what this society has become where we pay the lesser people to do the jobs we all need. I am proud to work hard for my money. But I am not proud to work anymore if I am to be underminded by some spic that will just send his below minimum wage paycheck back to mexico. Screw that!
I want to do anything I can to help in the cause. I want to do whatever I can do to make the masses more aware of the rot that the mexican society has made my beautiful state.
I want to sit in a normal resturant and know my food wasn’t handeled by another dirty Spic.
Stand with me. Make a difference. Shun these people and make them aware of their rightful place in this society as non-existant.

Thank you

Comment from john hatton
Time January 11, 2009 at 11:22 pm

i jsut want t osa y something! why do you german people think that you are the superior race? do yo uknwo that oy uwere one of the first immigrants in this land! wh y oy uimmigrated here? becaseu yo ur country was so poor in the late 1800″s t oearly 1900″s hundreds appox. in facts! so why do yo u think that yo ucan be superior. yo uare an insecure race. with no education adn no morals or values; do yo uever think about what happen in the concentration camps adn how those children an adults died in burnign chambers ?
did oyu ever think about that? oyu have no heart as a human. yo urepresent us humans as evil demons and that is not what we want t obe portrayed as ok. do actually think tht oy ucan run a country or organization with no education or social skills adn n opresence that you will have followers with the right mind? noway
possible only insecure empty minded people will follow your organization who have nothing to add to support your organization. al yo upeople do is drugs and drink and kill, no one wants to be part of that. restrategize be more proactive smarter more brilliant in other words and the noy umight have a chance to rule the world but hat would be impossible to the extreme per say. one last thing iwant to say relate to your families and kids before you kill other families or kids , think about how would yo ufeel if that was you ok
and then yo uwil lwake up.

Comment from j. christ
Time January 12, 2009 at 2:05 am

We should all just try to work together to make things good for everyone, no?

Comment from KURBCHECK
Time January 12, 2009 at 2:17 am

UNDER THE PATRIOT ACT..YOU ARE CONSIDERED TERRORISTS….HAVE FUN BEING WATCHED BY THE FEDS FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE.JAJAJA…GO BACK TO STARBUCKS!

Comment from billy roper
Time January 12, 2009 at 11:41 am

The Founding Fathers of this country were considered domestic terrorists by the British, too, eh?

Shinigami, Mexico will never be better than the U.S., so long as it is populated by…Mexicans.

Comment from bob
Time January 12, 2009 at 1:54 pm

so i am still wondering what do all u racist people do during football season play darts? think of stupid racist jokes if you would put your foolish views aside go to a game and enjoy life you would be happier

Comment from Kinga Haiti
Time January 12, 2009 at 6:23 pm

I got you Billy, you can’t run away, what can you tell me about Ronald Mallett, if you don’t answer me I’m gonna tell everybody I know in New Orleans that you’re a coward, I got you, all races have the same capacity of producing brilliant minds and there are more astrophysicists appearing on T.V., I got you

Comment from David Jansen
Time January 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm

White People, if you get the chance, try to watch the documentary on The New Black Panthers, on the National Geographic station. Their formner leader, whom is dead now from a brain blood clot , encouraged all his niggers to murder White people. He told them to murder them in their own living rooms. And then go in the bedroom and if you see a White baby, stab it to death too. The new leader stated when being interviewed, he hates White people, all of them, no matter who they are. They want a revolution, badly. I say, what are they waiting for? They think they can take this country? They are only 12% of the population. They don’t like anyone that isn’t black. I wish they would start a revolution. They would kill a lot of people, but we would wipe them out. And I say, take no prisoners. The only thing I agree with them is that they are separatists. They don’t want black and White to mix. If there is ever an all out war between black and White, I will kill as many of them as I can. And If I see a pale face on their side, they will be my first target. If a White woman sleeps with those apes, then she is one of them. She is a whigger. If she wants to live with them, she can die with them. I haven’t heard of anyone raising Hell about the Panther, Mr. Mohammad, encouraging his people to murder ours; even babies. What if David Duke or Tom Metzger ever made a comment like that. There would be riots and protests everywhere; even by Whites. But let a White man even say “Nappy haired ho’s” and he is ridiculed by everyone and gets fired from his job. Come on White People, we need to be heard when blacks say crap about us. Just watch a black comedian on t v sometime. None of them can get though their act without making fun of White folks. I for one am sick of it. If there is supposed to be free speech then we all should be able to say what we want, not just the damn niggers. All of my White brothers and sisters, please, arm yourselves. Have at least one firearm for each adult in every home. And take self defence lessons. We have bloodthirsty enemies who want us dead. How many Whites have already died because of Mr. Mohammad’s orders that we aren’t aware of. Be prepared. There will be a revoultion someday. Thank God we have a lot of White guys with balls already; skinheads. They will be the first to fight, just like the marines. There are more White racists in this country than anyone is aware of. Skinheads Klansmen, Aryan brothers etc. And a lot of Lone Wolves, like me. I am ready. Don’t take all this lightly. Be prepared! And unite.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 13, 2009 at 3:51 am

Mike, I do know who he is, but sitting around talking about whether the grandfather paradox negates time travel or just creates alternate realities in parallel universes doesn’t contribute much substantial to human civilization, does it? Let him build the machine, then I’ll be impressed.

Bob,

So, A football game is really more important to you than the pedigree of your grandchildren, and whether or not they are going to grow up in an America which has become just another third world nation? Really? Pan et circense.

Comment from TheBluntTruth
Time January 13, 2009 at 4:54 am

Bravo!

Comment from KURBCHECK
Time January 13, 2009 at 8:11 am

were a country of immigrants…besides nazism is a farce.

Comment from David Jansen
Time January 13, 2009 at 2:10 pm

To John Hatton, please go back to school and take a course or two in American English so you can learn how to write and spell. Then you can come back and write an intelligent letter to us. If that’s possible

Comment from Peace
Time January 14, 2009 at 7:33 pm

We are all human beings and the color of our skin doesn’t matter. Racism (and this IS a racist website) stems from fear.

Comment from Eddie
Time January 14, 2009 at 8:28 pm

Bravo Mr. Roper , i watched your segment on NGC the other night.Keep on fighting the good fight.I would love to join up, but residing in MA, I would not be vouched for.We need more whites to wake up and realize our country is being torn apart by black and hispanic economy sucking leeches.

Comment from chuck
Time January 14, 2009 at 8:55 pm

When was the last time you saw a white man with a black woman on a date. As a white man, I can not fathom dating, or worse yet, marrying one. White women are somewhat screwed up in the head, and can’t figure what they see in most of them living in poverty with four or five zebra kids running around the house with no Dad in sight. A friend’s daughter once said of black boys, “But they’re so cute.”, well monkeys are cute too, but I would not marry one or have sex with it. Blacks are like roaches and rats, destroying all they come in contact with, wherever they live. They have been in Africa for a few hundred thousand years and still live in huts, eat each other, and starve a few million of their own kind every year. Why, they are sub-human, stupid, and too lazy, just waiting for “Old Whitey” to come and bail them out.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 15, 2009 at 11:39 am

Eddie, We do have members in MA who can meet with you personally if you decide to join, so please don’t let that hold you back!

From: http://www.amazon.com/Race-Reality-Differences-Vincent-Sarich/dp/0813340861

Prevailing social dogma, from which dissent is effectively prohibited, asserts that “race does not exist.” “Racism,” however, does (a neat trick), thereby justifying institutional accumulation of data on race and the systematic implementation across the legal and cultural spectrum of laws and policies discriminating against a single group.

It is manifestly obvious to everyone, including race deniers, that race does in fact exist. Race denial is driven by ethnic and ideological animus, not scientific empiricism. The leading academic architects of the dogma–Franz Boas, “Ashley Montagu” (Israel Ehrenberg), Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin, and Jared Diamond–as well as the creator of PBS television’s race denial documentary, Race: The Power of an Illusion (all are discussed in the book), belong to an ethnic group exempt from official discrimination, and share a Left-wing ideological tilt that is sometimes extreme (Marxist)…

…Humans and chimpanzees are genetically 98.9% the same, and different human races 99.9% the same, race deniers assert. (Anthropologist Peter Frost calls this ploy the “small percentage fallacy.”) And yet, say the authors, imagine “a random assortment of fifty humans and fifty chimpanzees. No one . . . would have any difficulty in reconstituting the original fifty-member sets by simple inspection . . .” Likewise, applied to 150 humans selected 1/3 each from Japan, Malawi, and Norway, “[a]gain, by simple inspection, we would achieve the same 100 percent sorting accuracy.” Moreover, if the 100% rule is relaxed so the criterion is “nearer the 75 percent that has often sufficed for the recognition of races in other species, then obviously the number [of identifiable human races] would be very large.” The great population geneticist Sewall Wright (died 1988), who asserted the reality of race throughout his life, likewise employed this technique.

Comment from drew
Time January 16, 2009 at 10:49 am

please answer me - you guys feel passinitly about what you say and you spend alot of time into white issues why not spend that time trying to love do you realize how much you are missing out on what are you going to do on superbowl sunday sit around and hate yourlives while the rest of america is watching football i am white and i have friends of all races do you hate black people for what some do than you should also hate white people for the same most serial killers are white btk ted bundy the killers clown who killed and molested kids , people are indivuals no matter what there race please spend your time doing something to unite all people not tear people apart i seen this show on tv about this nsm it was horrible the way people act

Comment from drew
Time January 16, 2009 at 11:07 am

u know billy roper your mind is so clouded that you cant see it is not about football its about there are millons of football fans in america who watch the nfl everyweek millions of white people who are not racist how many people do you see wearing a jersey of a player of another race face the facts there are black racist and white racist but all this talk about minortiys you the racist are the minority what is worst than anything is the way you twist the scriptures to say thing that they dont read acts 10 :34 and 35

Comment from billy roper
Time January 16, 2009 at 11:16 am

Sure, there are a lot of shallow, ignorant, sheeplike people in the world. But I don’t base my beliefs or my value system by taking a poll and determining what is popular or trendy. In fact, for someone who cites bible verses, you seem remarkably ignorant of just how unpopular that guy and his movement was. I can easily imagine a Roman saying “That Jesus is so out of touch with everyone else. Millions of people from all religions watch the gladiatorial games in the colliseums, and cheer for contestants from other relgions, what does it matter? His mind is so clouded by hatred, next thing you know he’ll be overturning the tables of the money lenders and chasing folks out of the temple. What a hater!”

http://podblanc.com/race-family

Comment from drew
Time January 16, 2009 at 11:27 am

billy are you implying that the people who dont hate are shallow or ignorant? its that ignorance that makes you the way you are. i know how unpopular jesus was the point i was trying to make is that god is not partal everyman is acceptable to him god does not fell the same way you do racist promote violence read psalms 11:5 god hates violence i am not here to argue the bible , my wife is half black i am full white do you hate me? should i die because i do not feel the same as you ? think about it

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time January 16, 2009 at 9:12 pm

So let me get this straight Drew, you are saying that because millions of ignorant white people watch one team of niggers try to beat another team of niggers at football, that somehow these millions of ignorant football watching white people are not racist? Give me a break. Ten bucks says half of those millions of white people said ” uh oh a nigger in the Whitehouse” , when Obama got elected. Sure their priorities are clouded at this point in time but that will all change when Super Nigger Obama starts working his magic on this country.

Comment from drew
Time January 17, 2009 at 8:27 am

wow chris thanks for taking time outside your kkk metteings to respond to my thoughts. when will you realize there will never be a time when most white people feel like you stop putting one race above another get a life

Comment from billy roper
Time January 17, 2009 at 11:25 am

Most White people, even those who pretend to believe that the races should be allowed to live in the same country (unlike Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, et. al.) would never choose to marry a nonWhite. Most of them believe, correctly, that it is unnatural, unhealthy, and contrary to nature’s law. They might smile and nod and pretend to be polite to mixed-race couples and families with gray-colored mullato niglets, but it’s just a social act. With the proper leadership, they’ll quite happily revert back to their natural instinctive behaviour of ostracizing those who betray their race.

To answer your question bluntly, do I hate race traitors? Yes. I also hate child molestors, as a group. I even hate people who are cruel to animals. I’m not very tolerant, and I don’t care to be.

Miscegenation was a felony from the founding of the American colonies up until fifty years ago in most states. Some day it will be a capital offense, because unlike simple rape or murder, which only directly harm an individual, miscegenation is a crime against all of one’s ancestors who struggled to survive so that their descendants could continue to evolve, and against all of one’s descendants, who can never do so.

Comment from drew
Time January 17, 2009 at 11:41 am

race traitor- wow i am a race traitor you know it is really low of you to but black people i the same catagolry as dogs and mixed couples in the same as child molesters you have alot of nerve but just like the kkk who hide behide white hoods you hide behind your computer. i live in mostly black area most of the people are just like my white freinds stop judging people you do not know think about it . you dislike me because who i marry that is really childish. peronally i dont care what abe lincoln thought i have a brain to think for myself

Comment from billy roper
Time January 17, 2009 at 12:09 pm

No, Drew, I don’t post anonymously, and I don’t hide behind a computer, or anything else. Everyone who knows me knows what I believe, and who I am.

Comment from drew
Time January 17, 2009 at 12:21 pm

have you ever told a black person how you feel to there face? and without your racist crew? i mean you alone telling a black man that he is lower than you?

Comment from billy roper
Time January 17, 2009 at 1:00 pm

Yes, I have; many times. Not everyone is in awe of lower primates, just because you are. I try to behave courteously to everyone, but I never hide or deny the truth. That’s the job of liberals and race traitors who come here to anonymously express their tolerance and love for everyone except those who disagree with them.

Comment from drew
Time January 17, 2009 at 5:08 pm

act courteously to everyone than why do you call black people dogs mud primates you are a punk thats the bottom line race traitor that is so stupid i guess when one buys ahouse in another state they are a state traitor you are a joke

Comment from Eddie
Time January 17, 2009 at 5:29 pm

Sorry Drew, you are just wrong…And BTW what are you doing here trying to change our minds?.. We dont come to your place and try to convince you not to be a race traitor, now do we?Billy Roper was on national television expressing his discontent for other races.Drew, I am a 30 year old educated white man, who believe it or not, I even enjoy football.I do not sit around all day “hating” and not enjoying life, not at all.I may enjoy football, but that does not mean i would befriend or share a beer with any of the black football players.It’s honestly just a fact that minorities are destroying this once great nation, black culture is negative and ignorant. Rap, drugs, gangs , murder…and it’s all because they want to play the part of the victim.For every 1 black doctor their is 500 gangbangers…Sorry in my book that just does not cut it in todays America.And lets talk about “FOOTBALL” the old saying “you can take a nigger out of the ghetto, but you cant take the ghetto out of the nigger” still rings true, blacks in football and every other sport for that matter, just cant resist “acting the fool” Vick , Burress, Lewis ,Irving , Faulk,Iverson ect…ect… just cant adapt in civilized society.Im fed up Drew and we should stick together, because Drew when the race war happens, your so called black friends will be the first to throw you under the bus, to team up with their own kind its this shit liberals and race traitors refuse to see.

Comment from drew
Time January 18, 2009 at 7:33 am

eddie i agree vick is disgrace what he did is horrible but can you really say what hitler did was justifiable be honest to kill millinos of people who were not like him men. women , kids, babes? thanks for the concern but trust me when you have the right friends you dont have to worry about being throrwn under the bus .

Comment from billy roper
Time January 18, 2009 at 11:26 am

The Germans did not make lamp shades from Jewish skin, or soap from Jews, and there were no execution gas chambers. Overall, according to the International Red Cross statistics, more Germans died in U.S. and Soviet P.O.W. concentration camps during and after the war, than the number of Jews who died in camps during the war.

The number of Jews who died in Auschwitz keeps changing, ever being estimated downward, but people can still go to jail for repeating the official and verified statistics. Truth doesn’t have to silence its dissenters and create a system of laws and fines and imprisonment for those who disagree or know better than the official government position, but that’s the case in many Countries, today.

The Holocaust and Racial Equality are the new religions of today, and throughout Europe one can go to jail for denying either, just as one could be punished by the Church during the Inquisition for having heretical beliefs.

Comment from David Jansen
Time January 18, 2009 at 2:25 pm

To Drew, After reading all your comments, there is no doubt you are uneducated and ignorant, besides being stupid. Your grammer is terrible. You don’t use capital letters at the begining of sentences, or on proper names. Your spelling is bad. You don’t use comma’s or puntuation marks at all. I’m betting you never finished high school. You spend too much time hanging with your negro friends who are also ignorant and stupid. In my opinion anyone who is not a racist is stupid and ignorant. You need to take a course in English and in writing. You also need to watch the Discovery and National Greographic channels. They do documentaries on black gangs and organizations. Every major city in the USA has problems with black gangs. They are animals on two legs. They rape, murder, rob each other and White people. They are a huge threat to our race; a race that has been pretty much pure for several thousand years. But since integration started and had them going to our schools, race mixing has become rampant. Our young white people have many bad influences in music and television. Liberal Hollywood is the worst, with their race mixing shows and movies. And Hollywood, in case you don’t know, is owned and run by Jews. It has been since it started. Ever heard of Metro, Goldwyn and Myers? Jew names. They are strick about their mixing with non-Jews buy they sure like to influrence us Goyem (a name they use for us which I’ve been told means cattle) You Drew have a lot to learn about the world. You could start by reading David Dukes book “MY Enlightenment”. If that book doesn’t make you see the light, then are hopelessly stupid. If I hurt your feelings; tough crap.

Comment from Jahan
Time January 18, 2009 at 2:39 pm

Reply to “White on Rice”,

“White is not a race”

How did you reach this conclusion? Please share, so we can all be enlightened.

“There is no White continent”.

Ever heard of Europe?

Comment from Jeanette
Time January 18, 2009 at 3:46 pm

God wasn’t racist. So what do YOU people think of our BLACK president. I think it is going to be the best america has seen. I am a white woman. I don’t believe in racism. It’s not in the bible. I don’t know where YOU people got it from. There are black people that hate white people just like whites that hate black they are all stupid

Comment from Hakoda
Time January 18, 2009 at 4:32 pm

to the people on nat geo, about nazis-i am disgraced to say that i am an american because of you. you are not making this nation better, you are a huge disgrace to this nation .i am jewish and u would not know it unless i told you so get a new symbol. and as to the burning of the books, read some of them and learn how miserable people are with people like you around.

Comment from Taylor
Time January 18, 2009 at 4:40 pm

I was just reading a comment of a Billy Roper, and I understand your logic when it comes to subspecies. Technically, different races of humanity (black, white, ect.) are subspecies of the entire human race. What bothers me is that you are comparing that with subspecies of dogs. That is simply not a fair comparison. The differences humans that come from different parts of the world have are actually very minor(physically speaking). Things like different skin, eye, and hair color come from their enviornment, mostly the sun. Facial features are also different, but they are relitivly minor differences also, when compared to the difference of a pit pull and a poodle. If you look at dogs, their intelligence is relitively the same with each breed. With humans, race is an incredibly small factor when it comes to intelligence. In fact, who a person is, how intelligent they are, and what they are like, is determined more by enviornment than by genes.
Both of my parents (who are also both white) started out dirt poor when they got married, and are now upper middle class. This is because they come from familys who taught them to work hard, not because they were white. There is a black family that lives a couple doors down from me that had a similar situation. Both of the adults started poor, and through hard work, are now middle class. The reason there are fewer blacks with higher incomes than whites comes from slavery, really. Racial laws were what first prevented them from achieving, and now, centuries of poverty make it hard for many to break the chain and do well for themselves. Because of their parents low income, many minorities end up living in bad neighborhoods with bad schools. Of course they aren’t completly inoccent, because it is certianly within their power to achieve and do great things. Often, though, because of their environment, they don’t even want to try. This has nothing to do with them being black.
There are plenty of whites in the same situation. I see many whites dressed as gansters at my school, and it has to do with their enviornment, not their race.
I respect your ability to calmy and politly discuss this, but I certianly don’t agree with your ideals. I’m proud of my European herritage, and there’s nothing wrong with that, but I hope you open you mind to see how unreasonable it is to base things off of a person’s race.

Comment from drew
Time January 18, 2009 at 4:46 pm

I have alot to learn? Thanks David, at the end of your comments you forgot the word “you ” next to than are hopelessly stupid. So you are not perfect on the computer either.Yes there major problems with gangs, i agree there are alotof black gangs , there are also alot of good black people. All you are doing is using the bad as the example use the good i am tired of telling you there are good and bad in all races. Any who hate are part of the bad. you can hate me and all the other nonracist and race traitors and all who are not like you, but we do not hate you only have pity for your confussion and hypocricy.

Comment from Taylor
Time January 18, 2009 at 4:53 pm

I was just reading through some of the comments, and I have to say, I’m ashamed.
Just because you don’t agree with a person’s views doesn’t mean you just call bullshit on it and don’t even try to give a real, rational response. Surprisingly, I’m talking to the anti-racists here that aren’t bothering to do anything more than say racists are uneducated. I’m anti-racists as well, but as long as someone is being kind to you, you have no right to be mean, and just downright cruel to them, even if you don’t agree! It’s just childish.
I also saw a comment saying everybody likes Obama because of who he is, which is a lie. Many people voted for him simply because he was black, which isn’t fair. During the whole campaign, he used his race to his advantage, acting like a second Dr. King instead of bringing forth real ideas! Not to mention how close his ideas are to socialism. I don’t like Obama, not because he’s black, but because he unfairly used that to his advantage. Most of the people who voted for him didn’t even bother to see what he really wanted to do for this country, and see what effect it will have on us.
I have to say, I find it just plain embarrasing that so few anti-racists here are acting like children. At least Billy Rope is being polite!

Comment from Taylor
Time January 18, 2009 at 6:05 pm

“The Germans did not make lamp shades from Jewish skin, or soap from Jews, and there were no execution gas chambers. Overall, according to the International Red Cross statistics, more Germans died in U.S. and Soviet P.O.W. concentration camps during and after the war, than the number of Jews who died in camps during the war.

The number of Jews who died in Auschwitz keeps changing, ever being estimated downward, but people can still go to jail for repeating the official and verified statistics. Truth doesn’t have to silence its dissenters and create a system of laws and fines and imprisonment for those who disagree or know better than the official government position, but that’s the case in many Countries, today.

The Holocaust and Racial Equality are the new religions of today, and throughout Europe one can go to jail for denying either, just as one could be punished by the Church during the Inquisition for having heretical beliefs.”

I find it hard to believe there are people who don’t believe things like this happened. Of course Jews died in gas chambers! Hundreds of thousands, if not millions died in the gas chambers, along with gypsies, blacks, and other races the Nazis considered sub-human. I at least respected that you were polite and tried to argue with valid points, but to be honest, I find it hard to belive anyone can contradict the huge amount of evidence there is supporting the facts of what happened during the Holocaust. I personally have read over a dozen books on the topic already.
I also have read books on the Nazis. To be fair, i read a book written by Hitler that wasn’t published until after his death, and i plan on reading Mein Kampf (I don’t know if i spelled that right). To be fair, he was a genius in his own right, but he was also a mass murderer who killed millions of innocent men, women, and children, and also played a large role in starting what many consider the largest and bloodiest war in human history, WWII. Say you agree with Hitler if you want, but don’t deny what he did. It’s ridiculous to say somebody you like, agree with, or are related to never did something wrong because of their connection to you. I would never deny what my ancestors have done, or even what some of my more recent relitives have done.
I also would like to mention several of my relitaves becam white trash due to their own laziness, and that is completly on their own selves, and not on anyone else. It’s almost funny to see the look on some people’s faces when i use my own relatives to dispell their racists theories.

Comment from Jahan
Time January 18, 2009 at 10:26 pm

Mr. Roper is entirely correct, about loyalty to ones own kind being a universally recognized human value (which shows it is part of human nature).

Even Genghis Khan - as brutal as he was - recognized this.

Here is an old story about him, from Afghanistan:

The Mongols were besieging a mountain top town. The town was very secure.

Its position allowed it to dominate any approach by the enemy, so that the Mongols could not capture it.

However, a woman from the town had spied Genghis Khan, and had admired him from a distance, and wished to aid him.

Under the cover of darkness, she stole out, and revealed to the enemy of her people a secret way to attack the town.

The Mongols attacked immediately - and captured the town.

Genghis Khan, following his custom when faced with resistance, killed all the town’s people.

Being no fan of traitors, he reserved a special fate for the woman who had betrayed her people to him: he had her stoned to death.

All you Whites who attack Mr. Roper: think about this story - and others like it.

You who try to hinder those who are defending your people: do not expect mercy from the enemies of your people, and don’t think that they will show you gratitude and respect for betraying your own people to them.

If White people are defeated, the worst fate of all will be reserved for you.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 19, 2009 at 3:12 am

Even the Jews themselves now admit that the claims that lampshades and soap were made from Jews was a propaganda lie, and have admitted that far fewer than six million died, despite what they originally claimed. The gas chambers were used to delouse their clothes, lice caused the typhus from which most Jews died in the camps, and Zyklon B was a pesticide used to delouse the clothes. if you study the logistics, gassing en masse is much less efficient than just shooting them would have been, and noone has ever accused the Germans of being inefficient. Of course, they weren’t the first to dislike the Jews…one wonders why they have always been so universally disliked?

Egypt

The first documented anti-Jewish riots broke out in the Egyptian city of Alexandria in 38 AD, recurring again in 66 AD. In 115 - 117 AD, Jews once again came under attack in that city and their synagogue was burned to the ground. In 414 AD, Jews were formally expelled from that city.

Mesopotamia and Persia

In 40 AD, an anti-Jewish riot broke out in the city of Seleucia on the Tigris River, in which a number of Jews were killed. The book of Esther in the Christian Old Testament (and in the Jewish Talmud) deals exclusively with a Persian anti-Jewish movement.

Rome

It was in Imperial Rome that the very first Jewish community in Europe was formally established in 139 BC. It was not long before Roman opinion was aroused against them: they were the subject of frequent attacks in the Roman senate in speeches by amongst others, the famous orator Cicero, around the year 50 BC.

Many other prominent and famous Romans, such as Senecca, Juneval and Tacitus all went on record as complaining about the activities of Jews within the Roman Empire. Anti-Jewish literature was widespread and one work by the Greek, Apion, was so well known that the Romanized Jewish historian Josephus (who wrote an excellent account of the Jewish uprising of A.D. 70 called The Jewish Wars) wrote a whole book trying to refute Apion’s arguments.

The Roman emperor, Tiberius, formally expelled the Jews from Rome in 19 AD but they soon returned, only to be expelled once again in 49 AD.

In 116 AD, the emperor Trajan, ordered all Jews in Mesopotamia to be killed, saying that the Jews were the cause of continual uprisings in that region.

The Great Revolt of 66 AD

After the Romans had been invited to annex Palestine by Jewish leaders in an attempt to quell internal political dissension, Jewish nationalists then launched a long running war against the Roman rulers of Palestine. In 66 AD, a violent insurrection, led by the Zealots, a fanatic Jewish sect, was launched against Roman authority. Emperor Nero sent the Roman general Vespian, to put an end to the conflict. By 70 AD, the revolt was crushed and Jerusalem was razed.

The Roman emperor Hadrian ordered Jerusalem rebuilt as a pagan city, to be called Aelia Capitolina, in honor of Jupiter and himself (Publius Aelius Hadrianus); at the same time he issued an edict banning circumcision, a rabbinical law used to identify true Jews.

Jewish agitation against Roman rule continued: under the leader Simon Bar Kokhba, Jewish nationalists fought a doomed battle with the legions of Rome from 132 to 135 AD. As punishment, the victorious Romans then attempted to obliterate all Jewish presence in the province: the name of the land was changed to Syria Palaestina. Jerusalem was made a pagan city, and the death penalty was decreed for any Jew who entered its gates.

ROMAN EMPEROR Justinian LAUNCHES ANTI-JEWISH CAMPAIGN

One of the most famous emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian, (527-565 AD) adopted a comprehensive anti-Jewish policy, barring Jews from the civil service, military posts and any other positions of influence in his government.

CONTRADICTORY Christianity CONDEMNS AND ELEVATES JEWS

The coming of Christianity was a double edged sword for the Jews: on the one hand it elevated them into a special place as the “Chosen People” or the “People of the Book” but on the other hand they were made directly responsible for the death of Christ, the crucifixion of God himself.

Above: A common Christian accusation against Jews - Host Desecration. This entailed sticking knives or sticks into holy Christian food used at Mass as a symbol of their hatred for Christianity. Like many similar accusations, this was more a figment of Christian imagination than reality.

This Christ-killing blame was seized upon by anti-Jewish Christians who tried to reconcile the obviously Jewish origins of their religion with their beliefs: in this way, in what are obvious Christian “additions” to the biblical texts, the Jews are made out to be blamed for Christ’s death.

In Matthew 27:24-25, the Roman governor of Palestine, Pontius Pilate, when refusing to have anything to do with the crucifixion of Christ, allegedly says that he is innocent of the “blood of this just person” and the Jews respond to him that “his blood be on us, and our children.” The Catholic Church only formally repudiated the charge that all Jews are responsible for the death of Christ and at the Second Vatican Council held from 1962-1965, although how they reconciled this with the relevant Biblical passage was never explained.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 19, 2009 at 3:24 am

1933: Jewish Declaration of War on Germany

The very first declaration of war which led up the Second World War was in fact made on 23 March 1933, when a meeting of Jewish leaders from around the world formally and publicly declared war on the Hitler government, which at that stage was only two months old and had passed none of its racial laws.

The Jewish declaration of war was carried publicly by a large number of newspapers, including the Daily Express in London, which ran a bold full-page headline “Judea Declares War on Germany” on its edition of 24 March 1933. Calling on all “Jews of the world to unite” the meeting of Jewish leaders resolved to launch a series of mass demonstrations and also to institute a worldwide boycott of German goods, presumably through their international business connections.

Unwittingly, this public declaration of war on Germany only served to inflame anti-Jewish feeling in Germany: the German government barred Jews from holding public office or “positions of influence” which were defined as university lecturing posts, journalists or newspaper editors, amongst others.

This declaration of war also provided the legal basis upon which Germany would later justify its internment of large numbers of Jews inside Germany: America had after all, interned its Japanese, as had Canada, and Britain had interned all its Italians. If Jews had declared themselves at war with Germany, the Nazis argued, then it would not be unreasonable to treat them as a hostile group and intern them as well. Despite this, not all Jews were interned, even right through the war.

So it was that when the Soviet Army occupied Berlin in 1945, a fully functioning Jewish community a few thousand strong, complete with synagogue, was still in existence in the German capital.

The Concentration Camps

Nazi Germany is however most known for its concentration camps, and particularly those in which large numbers of emaciated and dead prisoners were discovered at the end of the war, and which have become synonymous with any image of that era. The first concentration camps were set up soon after the Nazis came to power, with the best known being Dachau, which is situated to the north of Munich.

These camps were in fact large prisons, and the prisoners were sentenced by civil courts to fixed terms of imprisonment which depended upon the crime committed. These crimes could be overtly political - membership or activism in the banned Communist Party was common - but was also extended to all other crimes, including conventional criminal activities such as theft or robbery. Eventually homosexuals were also interned: although this would only occur quite a while later.

It was in fact a former Communist, who had been sentenced to imprisonment in the Dachau concentration camp for several months, and then released, who planted a bomb at the Munich beer cellar in November 1939. The bomb very nearly killed Hitler (he left early: if he had kept to the program for the speech that night, he would most certainly have been killed). The fact that the perpetrator was a former camp inmate, released after the war had started, is however the point: it showed that sentencing to the concentration camps was not necessarily a permanent condition and that it was not Jews alone who were sent to the camps.

That imprisonment at the camps was not necessarily permanent, has been proven beyond question by the uncovering in the Moscow State archives of a release note for a prisoner from Auschwitz itself in 1944 - supposedly at the height of that camp’s gas chamber operations.

It was however so that a large number of Communists who were interned were Jews: however, by the time that the Second World War broke out in September 1939, the majority of Germany’s Jews - some 319,900 out of a total population of 500,000 - had emigrated from Germany for good, leaving only some 180,000 Jews in Germany itself. (Racial Hygiene, Medicine Under the Nazis, Robert N. Proctor, Harvard University press, 1988). As the existence of the Jewish community in Berlin in 1945 showed, not even all of these had been interned during the war.

Comment from drew
Time January 19, 2009 at 7:01 am

billy after reading your stats about what you think happened in germany, its seems that you downplay how horrible it was to ease your conscience or at least to make your cause not seem so bad. If you do not like the way things are done by the race mixing, and you love the euro dna why not pack up leave the usa and move to germany ?

Comment from billy roper
Time January 19, 2009 at 10:13 am

I don’t have to go back to Europe because my ancestors fought and sweated and bled and died to conquer this continent and turn it from a wilderness populated only by stone age savages into the best country, potentially, on earth. I’ll not abandon the graves of my sires or the inheritance of my descendants. Of course, the enemies of our race are doing the same thing to Europe which they are doing to the U.S., brining in millions of nonWhites and encouraging race-mixing to the extent that most European cities have large nonWhite populations, too. The fact that you would even suggest such a thing reveals your ignorance of that situation, as well. The Jewish control over Germany is now so strong that freedom of speech does not exist there for Whites, and anyone who expresses pride in their race or concern for its future is sent to prison. As you’ve read on this website from nonWhites, that’s what they want to do here, too.

And no, I don’t feel the need to downplay the deaths of Jews or anyone else during World War II, the deaths of nonWhites doesn’t affect my conscience like the continual death of my fellow Whites does. Ultimately, when it comes to the question of how many Jews died during World War II, I look around and see who controls the mainstream media in the U.S. and Europe, I look at their representation in government, I look at their establishment of a racially-based terrorist state which enslaves and oppresses and murders its neighbors, and I can only think…”not enough”…

Comment from drew
Time January 19, 2009 at 10:42 am

Billy focus on what i am saying. There are evil jews, there are evil blacks, there are evil mexican, there are evil whites. To look at what some do of any color and see others of that same race should die or as you so “not enough” is very unethlical. should you die because of what the romans did to christains or how about Manson ? Manson is responsable for his actions and he should pay for what he did. the same with jews or any black people. If there were 5000 black people in one area and 3000 were evil and 2000 where good honest people why should you hate the 2000 for waht the 3000 did? the % that i made od evil was very high (60%) i did that to show you that the 40% have no accoutableity for what others do. when you said that your ancestors conquer this continent you mean they illegally came and took it from the indains which is okay? but know you hate it when mexicans do the same? personally i dont agree with either!

Comment from billy roper
Time January 19, 2009 at 10:47 am

But, I don’t believe in equality or fairness, and never have done. I’m an unabashed advocate for my race and its interests. Have you not quite picked up on that, yet?

Comment from Jeanette
Time January 19, 2009 at 12:24 pm

I really can’t believe history channel would air something like your program.It’s awful.We non-racist people need to get together and petition to get your show off the air. While looking up your website I came across http://www.adl.com. It’s beyond words what Hitler and the Germans did to ALL the people who wasn’t like them even WHITE people with handicaps were shunned. Millions and millions of Jews were killed for NO reason even children - God’s children. Jesus is a Jew it’s not debatable it’s in the bible.Anybody against what this website stands for needs to check out http://www.adl.com read some of them stories the kids wrote it is heartbreaking one word for it WHY!!!!!! Everybodys judgement will come one of these days and there will be no mercy for the evil and racism is evil!!!!!

Comment from Taylor
Time January 19, 2009 at 12:54 pm

I can’t believe what you think about the concentration camps. You honestly think people who sent there were sent to those places for crimes they commited?? What about the thousands of innocent children who died? What about the people who were forced from their homes, had everything taken from them, even though they had been good citizens? And you don’t think that the gas chambers were used to kill? What are your sources for your information? And i mean respectable non-biased sources that come from people who really wanted to learn the truth?
And what about the countless accounts of not only the Jews (And gays, gypsies, blacks, and communists) but of the Nazis in the camps? Can you honestly deny all of that?
And I know Jews have been persecuted throughout much of history. Jesus himself was Jewish. Just because they were persecuted doesn’t mean they all commited crimes. I also know that not all Germans knew of the camps, nor did they or would they all have condoned it. You can never hold a person responsible for what others of their race have done, but only for what they have done.
And i would also love to know where you got your information on this war the Jews supposedly waged on the Germans. Even if a group of Jews declared war, I have little doubt in my mind it was a radical Jewish group. There are radicals within every religion or group.
You also said the Jews said the number of them killed isn’t at 6 million, which i would agree with. I doubt the number is much smaller, but the exact number of people killed is constantly debated, and will never be know. Most reliable sources say anywhere from 12-13 million people may have died in the Holocaust, nearly 6 million of them Jews. The rest were other undesirables.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 19, 2009 at 1:41 pm

1) Why did Elie Wiesel and countless other Jews survive the Holocaust if it was the intention of the Third Reich to eliminate every Jew they got their hands on? Elie was a prisoner for several years; other Jews survived even longer. Most of these “survivors” were ordinary people who did not have any unique expertise that the Germans could have exploited for their war effort. There was no logical reason for them to be kept alive. The very existence of more than a million survivors even today, some sixty years later, contradicts one of the basic components of the Holocaust i.e. that the Germans had a policy to eliminate every Jew they got their hands on.

2) Why is there no mention of the Holocaust in Churchill’s six volume History of the Second World War or the wartime memoirs of either De Gaulle or Eisenhower or any of the other lesser luminaries who wrote about the Second World War. Keep in mind all these were written years after the war ended and thus after the Holocaust had been allegedly proven by the Nuremburg Trials? With regard to the Holocaust, the silence of these ” conoscenti ” is deafening!

3) What was an inmate infirmary (and a brothel) doing in Auschwitz if in fact it was a death camp?

4) Why would the Germans round up Jews from their far flung empire, thereby tying up large numbers of personnel and rolling stock, while fighting a world war on two fronts to deliver people to “death camps” hundreds of miles away who were then executed upon arrivalŠwouldn’t a bullet on the spot have appealed to legendary German sense of efficiency?

5) Why after sixty years have historians been unable to come up with a single German document that points to a Holocaust? Should we believe the likes of Raul Hilburg that in the place of written orders there was an “incredible meeting of the minds” by the literally tens of thousands of people who would have had to coordinate their actions in order to carry out an undertaking of this magnitude?

6) How come it is still insisted upon that six million Jews were killed when the official Jewish death toll at Auschwitz, the flagship of the Holocaust gulag, has been reduced from a immediate post war figure of 3 [?] million, to a figure of somewhat less than one million? Why do many respond to this observation by saying, ” what’s the difference whether it’s six million or one million”. The answer is that the difference is five million. Another difference is that saying so can get you three years in an Austrian jail…just ask David Irving!

7) All of Germany’s wartime codes were compromised including the one used to send daily reports from Auschwitz to Berlin. The transcripts of these messages make no mention of mass executions or even remotely suggest a genocidal program in progress. Furthermore it has been insisted that the Germans used a kind of euphemistic code when discussing their extermination program of the Jews e.g. final solution, special treatment, resettlement etc. Why was it necessary for them to use such coded euphemisms when talking to one another unless they thought their codes had been cracked by the Allies?

The water table at Auschwitz lies a mere 18 inches below the surface which makes claims of huge burning pits for the disposal of tens of thousands of victims untenable.

9) Initially, claims were made that mass executions in homicidal gas chambers had taken place in camps located within the boundaries of the old Reich e.g. Dachau, Bergun-Belsen. “Evidence” to that effect was every bit as compelling as what was offered for other camps, located in occupied Poland, yet without explanation in the early sixties we were told that this was not the case and that all the “death camps” were located in the East i.e. Poland outside (some would say conveniently) of the probing eyes of western scholars.

10) No one has been able to reconcile the eyewitness accounts that personnel entered the gas chambers after twenty minutes without any protective gear and the fact that Zyclon B was a “time release” fumigant that would have had a lethal capability for at least another twenty four hours. And that even after twenty four hours the corpses would have themselves remained sufficiently contaminated by the hydrogen cyanide gas that they would have had the capacity to kill anyone who touched them who were not wearing protective gear.

11) Why do we no longer hear claims that the Germans manufactured soap, lamp shades and riding britches from the bodies of dead Jews - could it be that in the light of modern forensics and DNA knowledge these claims are totally untenable?

12) Why do we no longer hear claims that huge numbers of Jews were exterminated in massive steam chambers or electrocuted on special grids “evidence” of this was presented at Nuremburg - evidence that sent men to the gallows.

14) Elie Wiesel has been described as ” the Apostle of Remembrance” yet in his memoir, “Night” which deals with his stay at Auschwitz he makes no mention of the now infamous homicidal gas chambers. Isn’t this a bit like one of the Gospels making no mention of the Cross?

15) Virtually every survivor who was examined at Auschwitz says that he or she was examined by the infamous Dr. Mengele.

16) According to survivor testimony, hundreds of thousands of Jews were executed at Treblinka and then buried in mass graves in the surrounding area. Why is it that extensive sonar probing of these burial grounds reveals that this alleged final resting place for Holocaust victims has remained undisturbed since at least the last ice age?

17) “Proof” of the Holocaust rest primarily on survivor testimony; there little if any hard evidence. The best of this has been described by Jean Claude Pressac as merely “criminal traces”. Even Judge Grey who presided at the Irving-Lipstadt Trial commented that he was surprised the evidence pointing to the Holocaust was “extremely thin”. To paraphrase Arthur Butz, “a crime of this magnitude would have left a mountain of evidence” - where is it? There was more hard evidence against OJ Simpson at his trial and he was FOUND INNOCENT!

18) Why has Holocaust Revisionism been criminalized in at least eleven counties - what other historic truth needs the threat of prison or the destruction of one’s career to maintain itself. Should someone be sent to prison for expressing skepticism about the official Chinese claim that they suffered thirty five million dead in World War II ?

19) Why do the court historians insist that “denying the Holocaust” is like denying slavery or saying the earth is flat when it is nothing of the sort. The leading Revisionists are first rate scholars who hold advanced degrees from the world’s leading universities. Is there anyone comparable among those who say the world is flat or that slavery never existed?

20) Promoters of the Holocaust have expressed concerns about the remembering the Holocaust once the last survivors die. Why haven’t Civil War historians expressed similar concerns since the last survivor of that conflict died in 1959.

21) Survivors of the Holocaust have testified that smoke billowed from the crematoriums as they consumed the bodies of murdered victims - some eyewitnesses even claimed they could detect national origins by the color of the smoke. How can this be reconciled with the fact that properly operating crematoriums do not produce smoke of any color?

22) According to the official version of the Holocaust hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were rounded up in mid 1944 and sent to Auschwitz where most were gassed immediately upon arrival and their bodies were disposed of by burning in huge open air pits using railroad ties and gasoline. Why is that there is no evidence of these huge funerary pyres in the high resolution surveillance photos taken by Allied aircraft who were overflying the camp on a daily basis during this time period. Furthermore, why have no remains been found, since open pit burning, even when gasoline is used, generates insufficient heat to totally consume a body?

23) All of the liberated camps were littered with corpses; is there a single autopsy report or any other forensic evidence that shows that even a single one of these deaths was a consequence of poison gas?

24) The death toll for the Holocaust relies exclusively on population statistics provided by Jewish sources; has any independent demographic study been produced that shows that approximately six million Jews were “missing” at the end of the war?

25) Why do the wartime inspection reports of camps made by the International Red Cross contain no references to mass executions - it strains credulity that such monumental crimes could be hidden. The only explanations are that either these crimes were not occurring or that the Red Cross was complicit in a cover up.

26) Why has there been no effort to respond to the Leuchter Report?

27) ” The Holocaust was technologically possible because it happened “. Why is this intellectually bankrupt argument, which turns scholarship on its head, considered by the promoters of the Holocaust as historical truth, considered a sufficient response to the mounting Revisionist evidence to the contrary?

28) What other historical truths rely to the extent that the Holocaust does on so-called “eye witness” testimony - and why have none of these witnesses ever been cross examined? ***

29) According to the official version of the Holocaust, the Jews remained ignorant of their fate until the very end so skillful were their Nazis murderers in deceiving their victims. How can this ignorance be reconciled with the fact that the Jews have historically been as a group, the most literate and highly informed people on the planet with legendary access to the highest echelons of government.

——————————————————————————–

*** They have been cross-examined and found wanting in the two Zundel Holocaust Trials in 1985 and 1988.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 19, 2009 at 1:44 pm

By the way, the ADL is a jewish group, the full name of their organization is “The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith”, which means “Brotherhood of the Circumcised”, and they’ve been investigated for acts of espionage against the U.S. on the behalf of Israel.

Comment from drew
Time January 19, 2009 at 1:46 pm

billy you yet again do not answer my ?

Comment from Jeanette
Time January 19, 2009 at 3:12 pm

The diary of Anne Frank is NON-fiction She was a survivor od the holocaust. Not all Germans were bad some helped the Jews and others that weren’t the perfect German but if they was caught it was death yes there was an order to get rid of all the Jews the reason it didn’t happen was because some got away by living in sewers and in orphanages leaving the country. They hid to stay alive. Family separated from there children. Something to haunt them the rest of there lives

Comment from Taylor
Time January 19, 2009 at 3:18 pm

1)Jews were used for the German war effort, which is why many managed to survive. To shoot them on the spot would have been a waste of the bullets they needed. Those executing the Holocaust also did not want the majority to know Jews were being exterminated, which is another reason they were rounded up. Plus it’s easier to deal with all of the Jews if they are in one place.
2)I can’t say why it wasn’t mentioned, but there is a chance these books were focusing on the war, and not the Holocaust, which was in fact a seperate event using the cover of war to be able to operate and exist.
3)I’ve also questioned why an infirmary was there, and the conclusion i’ve come too is that since the inmates were being used for work, if they had a minor injury and could be sent back to work, than they should. They didn’t have medicine in the inmate infirmarys, and they were often used for selections.
4)I already mentioned how it would be more convienent to round the Jews up and put them in one place to be killed. This also helped them try to cover up what was going on. The camps, in the end, did contribute to the loss of the war because of Hitler’s obsession with eradicating the Jews. Many believed him to be mentally unstable when he continued to have trains running to the camps even when they should have been used to transport soldiers.
5)The Nazis wanted no written proof of what they were doing that could fall into the wrong hands. Any documents that did exist on the eradication of the Jews were probably burned, so they could never be found and used against them.
6)Around 6 million Jews were killed in all the camps combined. Aushwitz is only one of the camps, which is why experts say one million died there.
7)They were probably being overcatious, just in case any of these documents were in fact found. Even when they expected to win the war (so that the physical evidence of the camps could never be found), they weren’t dumb, and would have known documents could be found by the allies.
I’ve never heard the water table being that close to the surface, but it’s certianly possible they weren’t so much pits as bonfires.
9)From what i know, camps were located both within Germany and Poland. I don’t claim to know the exact loacation of each camp.
10)I would love to know from what source you read (or heard) of men walking in without protective gear. Accounts from Nazis as well as canisters found in the camps prove people were killed with the gas in the chambers. Their bodies were burned afterword.
11)I admit, the probability of everyday items being made from the Jews is very unrealistic. I never said that was absolutly true. Stories about that probably come from people who percieved the Nazis as monsters and hated them with passion, which was understandable.
12)Most of this has already been proven, so i don’t understand why anybody would come forward saying something happened when it was already known it happened.
14) Yes, he does mention them, but not in great detail, because he himself was never in one. He does mention the gas chambers, though, as well as the smoke coming from the cremotorium.
15)Yes, i’m sure they were. Many said he was also almost always there at first selection(when they first arrived), even when it wasn’t his turn to do selection. There are also reports of him whistling in the camp, as well as survivors of his experiements saying how he seemed to enjoy his work. =
16)That paticular one is conflicting. I personally think hundreds were not buried there, due to evidence supporting otherwise. That doesn’t make the deaths in other camps any less worse.
17)Proof? You want proof? Then go visit one of the death camps. Talk to one of the Nazis who admitted what happened there. Go to the museums with mountains of confiscated personal items. It’s possible trials of Nazis were biased because of the war, but many of them were in fact guilty. Not to mention the huge number of photographs taken of both live and dead prisoners.
18)Don’t assume i agree with such ridiculous laws. I am a supporter of free speech, so if a person wants to say they don’t think the Holocaust happened, they should be able to. That doesn’t mean i’m not going to force them to provide the evidence to counter the proof of what happened that’s already out there.
19)Scientists held in the highest regard also used to scoff at anyone who thought the world wasn’t flat, or that we are not in the center of the universe.
20)I don’t see why anyone would be concerned it will be forgotten. Perhaps they feel it’s not as set in history as the civil war is.
21)They were not meant to be proper crematoriums. They were simply meant to reduce the size of a person’s body, so they wouldn’t have so much mass to deal with. Plus, the crematoriums probably held more bodies than they were really meant to hold.
22)The Allies were not flying over the camp on a daily basis. The were photos taken in 1944 by an aircraft looking for military bases.
23)Thos who were killed by poised gas were almost always cremated.
24)Yes, actually. The Soviets were the first to say the death toll had been 4 million, but many Western historians were doubtful. In 1989, the number was rounded down to 1 million, which is accepted by most historians worldwide.
25)The red cross searched Ghettos, not the camps. The Nazis made prisoners of the Ghettos clean them up to the Red Cross’ satisfaction before they came. There are numerous eyewitness reports to support this.
26)How many people worked onthe Leuchter Report? And how many came forward to retest everything?
27)It’s a sufficient response if you don’t have the time nor technical knowledge to go into detail about how it was possible. Many people, less than a hundred years ago, wouldn’t have belived they could talk to someone on the other side of the world until they saw it for themselves (or used the technology). The fact that it had been done proved that it was possible. Granted, it’s a crude way to sum things up, but it is true.
28)I’m not completly sure what you mean they were found wanting. You should be specific. Holocaust victims have been examined and questioned. The fact that so many have virutally the same stories should be proof enough, but i suppose it’s not if you believe in a Jewish conspiracy. Remember, we have Nazi witnesses as well, not just inmate eye-witness accounts.
29)They didn’t know exactly what would happen, but many had an idea. That’s why so many escaped. Those who didn’t probably didn’t want to think the Germans would carry out such a plan. Even though they probably knew they were being taken to be killed, they didn’t want to think they were.

By the way, where exactly did you get all of this information?

Comment from Alex
Time January 19, 2009 at 5:48 pm

Billy,

I hate you. You make me hate all white supremacists, oh wait, I already do.

Millions of witnesses say the Holocaust happened. You are so twisted and convoluted that you simply cannot accept certain things. You racists can find ways to twist everything in your view… anyone can do that.

Enjoy the inauguration! Finally a bright day. Your president is black, enjoy it.

Comment from Kinga Haiti
Time January 19, 2009 at 6:05 pm

Billy, while your ancestors the Germanics were living in Stone Age and practicing cannibalism the Romans were building a sophisticated civilization. – And an African people like Abyssinia (Ethiopia) had a respectable level of civilization.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 20, 2009 at 4:47 am

The Romans were White. Did you not know that? At the time of Rome being founded, the Germanic tribes were already well into the Bronze age, so you are incorrect about that, as well. The traces of the first Nordic waves are perhaps lost for ever, or at the best only very dimly to be seen. From the time of early prehistory the north of Europe seems to have been the ‘womb of the nations’ (vagina gentium), the name given it later by the Romans. The dolmens — great stone structures that can be followed from Sweden, over Denmark, Schleswig-Holstein, northern Germany, Belgium, the British Isles, western France, Portugal, Spain, North Africa, to Palestine and Abyssinia — seem to be the work of one or more Nordic waves, which from time to time were set as ruling classes over Mediterranean populations. Schuchhardt ascribes (wrongly, I think) the dolmens to the West European culture; in the dolmens, too, of Algiers were found the bones of a tall, long-headed people, and in Abyssinia fair and light-eyed persons are still occasionally found to-day. The best mainstream anthropological source for this is Cp. Verneau, Anthropologie . . . de l’Éthiopie, 1909.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 20, 2009 at 4:56 am

The six million figure

On 24 May 1995, the Berlin newspaper Die Tageszeitung, reporting that the Holocaust museum in Yad Vashem was planned by the Zionists as early as in 1942, expressed surprise at the fact that such a step was already being envisaged at a time when most of the future victims were still alive. As a matter of fact, the legendary six million figure was repeatedly mentioned by prominent Jews long before World War Two ended.

In December 1944, before the liberation of Auschwitz by the Red Army, Soviet Jewish propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg — who in his articles regularly exhorted the Soviet soldiers to slaughter German civilians and to rape German women — wrote (1): “Ask any German prisoner of war why his compatriots annihilated six million innocent people, and he will simply answer: Well, they were Jews.” On May 31, 1944, another Jewish propagandist, Slovak Rabbi Dov Weissmandel, stated in a letter (2): “Up to this day, six times a million Jews of Europe and Russia have been exterminated.” Two years earlier, in May 1942, yet another Jewish propagandist, Nahum Goldmann, who would later become president of the Jewish World Congress, predicted at an event in New York that of eight million Jews living in the German sphere of influence only two to three million would survive the war (3). According to the orthdox Holocaust story, the extermination of the Jews had just begun at that time, so how could Goldmann know the future number of victims?

Our astonishment assumes huge proportions when we learn that the six million figure already made a premature appearance in 1919. On 31 October of that year, the American Jewish newspaper The American Hebrew bewailed a “holocaust” — this word, which means “sacrifice by fire” in the Greek language, was actually used in the article! — going on in some unspecified area in Eastern Europe. The author assured that this “holocaust” had claimed, or was about to claim, six million victims. The six million figure was mentioned no less than seven times. Six is the holy number of Judaism, so we can safely assume that the alleged number of Holocaust victims is a Jewish religious myth derived either from the Torah or the Talmud.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 20, 2009 at 4:59 am

The fraudulent methods used by the orthodox Holocaust historians

After the war, the Zionists and their hirelings resorted to all kind of impudent manipulations to prove this imaginary figure. While most orthodox Holocaust historians arrrive at slightly lower numbers of Jewish victims, it seems to be an unwritten law in Western society that it is not permissible to go below the five million limit. Raul Hilberg, whose three-volume study The Destruction of the European Jews is universally recognized as the standard work on the Holocaust, puts Jewish population losses during World War Two at 5,1 million (4).

In order to demonstrate the fraudulent methods used by the orthodox Holocaust historians, I will now quote some figures from Raul Hilberg’s work plus from a book written by another famous Jewish Holocaust expert, The War against the Jews by Lucy Dawidowicz (5). According to Hilberg, 2.67 million out of the total 5.1 million Jewish victims were murdered in six camps which the orthodox historians call “extermination camps”, a term found in no German wartime document. This means that 2.43 million Holocaust victims must have met their fate outside these “extermination centers”. But Lucy Dawidowicz tells us a completely different story, contending that no less than 5.37 million Jews were gassed in the “six killing factories” (6). Since her total death count is 5.9 million, these figures imply only 530,000 Jews died outside the “extermination camps.”

Now, how do the two auguste scholars arrive at their figures? What sources do they quote? The answer is very simple: None. While both books are replete with footnotes about the most trifling things, none of the two authors makes the slightest attempt to explain what their statistics are based upon. Quite obviously, these statistics are purely arbitrary and devoid of any scientific value. Hilberg and Dawidowicz name totally different death figures for some of the “extermination camps” — for example, Dawidowicz states that no less than 1.38 million Jews were murdered at Majdanek, while Hilberg contents himself with 50,000 -, and Hilberg’s figure of Jews who died outside the “extermination centers” is nearly five times higher than Dawidowics’s, yet both authors claim a total death Jewish toll of between five and six million, and both are hailed as splendid historians by the media.

When following the evolution of the Holocaust yarn, we notice that the death figures given for the so-called extermination camps Auschwitz and Majdanek have been drastically reduced by the orthodox historians in the last decades. During the Nuremberg trial, the Soviets contended that no less than four million people had been murdered at Auschwitz (7) but no Western historian has ever dared to accept this ridiculous figure. Raul Hilberg claims that one million Jews plus 300,000 non-Jews died at Auschwitz, and in 1994 Jean-Claude Pressac, whom the media extolled as the world’s leading expert on Auschwitz, lowered the total death toll to 631,000 (8). A similar evolution can be observed in the case of Majdanek. In the summer of 1944, after the liberation of the camp, the communists stated that 1.5 million had been murdered there, but already in 1948, the Poles lowered the figure to 360,000, and in the early ninetieth, it was further reduced to 230,000 (9).

Significantly, all these modifications do not affect the sacrosanct figure of six, or five to six, million Jewish victims at all. In other words, if you have a basket with six apples in it, you can eat one, two, three or even four of them, there are still six apples left. That’s Holocaust mathematics! And in several European countries, including once free Switzerland, you are obliged to believe this, otherwise you go to jail, and the media will label you a racist.

Even the modified figures of the orthodox historians are still vastly exaggerated. As a matter of fact, approximately 150,000 people, probably just over half of whom were Jewish, perished at Auschwitz, as Italian revisionist Carlo Mattogno will show in a study exclusively based upon German wartime documents (10). The combined number of Jewish and non-Jewish victims at Majdanek was about 42,500, as Mattogno has demonstrated in a book he wrote together with me (11). Of course, even these real figures are frightfully high, but it should be remembered that Anglo-American terror bombers murdered more German civilians in one single night than prisoners died at Auschwitz and Majdanek together during the whole war, and that the main cause of death in the camps were epidemic diseases the Germans were unable to control. The mass deportation of Jews to forced labour camps and the bad conditions prevailing in these camps were the result of total war, and in total war, people suffer and die — not only Jews. It should not be forgotten that tens of thousands of Catholic Poles and many thousands of Russian prisoners of war also died at Auschwitz and Majdanek, and that between 60,000 and 80,000 German civilians were murdered after the war in Polish communist concentration camps, often after hideous tortures. As Jewish author John Sack has documented in his famous book An eye for an eye, almost all of these authentic death camps were run by Jews (12).

Comment from drew
Time January 20, 2009 at 8:17 am

you down play the holcost because your very uneducated, you always mention my spelling, but refuse to see how unreasonable you are it was more than jews who died why did he kill the jehovahs witnesses? you should have an answer billy

Comment from billy roper
Time January 20, 2009 at 12:51 pm

Jehovah’s Witnesses in Germany probably were disliked for the same reason they were disliked here in the U.S….During the late 1930s and ’40s, the Jehovah’s Witnesses attacked the Roman Catholic Church and other Christian denominations so vigorously that many states passed laws against their inflammatory preaching. [7]

[edit] Pledge of Allegiance
Main articles: Minersville School District v. Gobitis and West Virginia v. Barnette
Mandatory flag pledges in public schools were motivated by patriotic fervor in wartime America. The first known mandatory flag pledges were instituted in a number of states during the Spanish-American war. During World War I, many more states instituted mandatory flag pledges with only a few dissents recorded by the ACLU. It wasn’t until World War II was drawing close that the practice was challenged directly in a way that rose through the court system.

In 1935, Rutherford pronounced a doctrine that declared saluting the flag to be a form of idolatry “contrary to the Word of God”[8], which in the US drew mob violence against Witnesses as they preached and caused many Witness children to be expelled from public schools.

This opposition so enraged local authorities, the American Legion, and other protectors of patriotism that the Witnesses were the only group during the World War II period to endure the kind of vigilante violence that had been so prevalent during World War I. Mob attacks upon Witnesses occurred in 335 communities in 44 different states in the six months running from May to October 1940 alone. Many of the injured were women and children.

In 1940, the Court ruled in an 8-1 decision that a school district’s interest in creating national unity was sufficient to allow them to require students to salute the flag. The Supreme Court’s Gobitis decision unleashed a wave of virulent anti-Jehovah’s Witness persecution across the nation. Lillian Gobitas later characterized the violence as “open season on Jehovah’s Witnesses.” The American Civil Liberties Union recorded 1,488 attacks on the Witnesses in over 300 communities between May 1940 and October 1940.

One Southern sheriff told a reporter why Witnesses were being run out of town: “They’re traitors; the Supreme Court says so. Ain’t you heard?” Angry mobs assaulted Witnesses, destroyed their property, boycotted their businesses and vandalized their houses of worship. Less than a week after the court decision, a Kingdom Hall was stormed and torched in Kennebunk, Maine.

American Legion posts harassed Witnesses nationwide. At Klamath Falls, Oregon, the American Legion started to harass the Witnesses assembled with requests to salute the flag and buy war bonds. Then they attacked the Witnesses and besieged the hall, breaking windows, tossing in stink bombs, ammonia and burning kerosene rags. The Witnesses’ cars were disabled and many overturned. The Governor was compelled to call out the state militia to quell the mob which reached 1,000 at its peak. [9] Witness missionaries were chased and beaten by vigilantes in Texas. Their literature was confiscated and even burned.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 20, 2009 at 12:59 pm

Of the 25,000 to 30,000 Germans who in 1933 were Jehovah’s Witnesses, an estimated 20,000 remained active through the Nazi period. The remainder fled Germany, renounced their faith, or confined their worship to the family. Of those remaining active, about half were convicted and sentenced at one time or another during the Nazi era for anywhere from one month to four years, with the average being about 18 months. Of those convicted or sentenced, between 2,000 to 2,500 were sent to concentration camps, as were a total of about 700 to 800 non-German Witnesses (this figure includes about 200-250 Dutch, 200 Austrians, 100 Poles, and between 10 and 50 Belgians, French, Czechs, and Hungarians).

The number of Jehovah’s Witnesses who died in concentration camps and prisons during the Nazi era is estimated at 1,000 Germans and 400 from other countries, including about 90 Austrians and 120 Dutch. (The non-German Jehovah’s Witnesses suffered a considerably higher percentage of deaths than their German co-religionists.) In addition, about 250 German Jehovah’s Witnesses were executed — mostly after being tried and convicted by military tribunals — for refusing to serve in the German military.

Comment from drew
Time January 20, 2009 at 2:27 pm

thank you billy that was a good article so do you think it was wrong for thoses jehovahs witnesses that died to be treated that way for what they believe?

Comment from Stanislaw Zewlakow
Time January 20, 2009 at 3:33 pm

Greetings from Poland - The Abyssinian kingdom was created by non-blacks, that’s a fact that history clearly points out, the non-white creators commited the mistake of mixing with blacks and now Ethiopia is one of the poorest countries on Earth. Light-skinned people is still found on the Highlands of Ethiopia.

Comment from John
Time January 20, 2009 at 5:38 pm

On October 31, 2008 at 10:52 pm someone with the intials A W (ass wipe?) mumbled:

“This site is ridiculous!!”

Au contraire!! This site is very informative and truthful! Ditto for other sites of the same nature. Your Pavlovian-response is what is ridiculous!

“It makes me ashamed that I am from the same state as these absurd idiots that came up with this website.”

No need to be ashamed, for there is NOTHING to be ashamed of. Your ’shame’ is due to the very subtle, but very effective, non-stop, anti-White brainwashing you have received in the school system, countless hours of television viewing, etc. For your information, racially-conscious Whites are some of the most open-minded, informed individuals that you can find.

The “idiots” are close-minded fools like you who have bought into the racial equality lie and “diversity” program which a) is detrimental to long term survival of the White race; and b) doomed to failure not because we say it but because history has proven it!

“You are closed minded and uneducated!”

It’s painfully obvious who is “close-minded and uneducated.” Your type don’t have any logical or fact-based response to counter or refute our beliefs. All your type do is call us names (like little children), kick, scream and shout when your belief system is challenged rather than respond intelligently and take time to investigate to find out if what we are saying is supported by facts and is indeed true or not. THAT is the sign of intelligence and open-mindedness, something totally foreign to you and your type.

The facts and truth are on OUR SIDE. Come join us!*

John

*That is, if you really are White.

Comment from John
Time January 20, 2009 at 7:40 pm

Jeanette asked:

“So what do YOU people think of our BLACK president.”

Black? He looks (and is) a mulatto to me. I think it is a travesty–both on racial and Constitutional grounds. To elaborate on the first, those great men who fought the Revolutionary War and responsible for the creation of this republic never, ever, ever intended, nor envisioned, nor would have allowed a Negro, mulatto or any variation there of, to run for the office of president the United States. Never! I don’t have to tell you how they would have responded had they been in our predicament.

The elaborate on the second: B. Hussein Obama does NOT meet the eligibilty requirement for the highest office in the land, and that being:

The United States Constitution requires that our President be a natural born citizen of the United States.

Since the ‘mainstream’ media (I prefer to call it the Jewstream media, for in reality, that’s what it is) won’t tell you, I’ll tell you:

B. Hussein Obama was born in Kenya; then shortly after his birth, flown to Hawaii with his mother and (fraudulently) registered as having been born there.

That being the case: HE IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THESE UNITED STATES and INELIGIBLE TO LEGALLY SERVE AS PRESIDENT.

If rule of law still exists and applies to the highest levels of government, B. Hussein Obama will be forced to step down. If not, all does not bode well for the future of this once-great Republic.

http://obamacrimes.com/

Not well, at all…

John

Comment from John
Time January 20, 2009 at 8:30 pm

Taylor the ignoramous, and very prolific spewer of mainstream ‘facts,’ just “knows” that:

“And I know Jews have been persecuted throughout much of history.”

Uh, excuse me…the word IS “prosecuted”–NOT “persecuted,” as these congenital liars, prevaricators and professional ‘victims’ would like, and many times INSIST, that you believe.

However, contrary to ‘mainstream’ stereotype, I being the fair, open-minded, reasonable, racially-conscious White, gentile man that I am, am willing to give them the benefit of a doubt and accept that maybe, just maybe, there may have been an instance or two in history where Jews were unjustly charged (scapegoated) and collectively punished. But knowing Jews as well I do, having observed and studied them for the last twenty or so years, especially so these last ten years on the Internet, thanks to a vast wealth of uncensored research material available on this topic, I can correcty presume that those other times they were guilty as sin. Oh sure, not ALL Jews were responsible (and guilty) even in those cases where they as a group could be rightfully blamed. Collective punishment is not fair to the group that is being collectively punished. Just ask the Palestinians. But if it helps get rid of the problem, then it’s the correct action to take.

I know, not fair. Then again, life is not fair.

John

Comment from John
Time January 20, 2009 at 9:20 pm

“billy after reading your stats about what you think happened in germany,”

Hey Drew, it’s not what Mr. Roper, or I, or any other like-minded person “thinks” happened in Germany, it’s what ACTUALLY happened during that time period according to the evidence substantiated and/or uncovered by revisionist historians, men (women?) who are not intimidated by organized Jewry’s far-reaching tentacles and their ‘official’ version of what transpired during the so-called holocaust.

An excellent book, for starters, is by Prof. Arthur R. Butz called: The Hoax of The Twentieth Century. Do a web search. You’ll find it. Read it.

If you are the type (like me) that want to confirm what you’ve been taught, read, or heard is actually true, half-true or not true at all.

Read it if you have an “open mind” and are not afraid to follow where truth, facts, and logical conclusions will lead you.

John

Comment from John
Time January 20, 2009 at 9:28 pm

“you down play the holcost because your very uneducated,”

Drew, your name calling and labeling is very stale. YOU are the epitome of “uneducated.”

Your type are here just agitate and argue.

You’ve had your chance to refute us. You didn’t because YOU CAN’T, simply ’cause the facts don’t support your argument.

Now go away.

John

Comment from John
Time January 20, 2009 at 9:40 pm

A hysterical Alex cried:

“You make me hate all white supremacists, oh wait, I already do.”

Let’s get this straight once and for all time: we are NOT nor have never been “white supremacists.” I resent that term!!! That is a pejorative label coined by our enemies.

If anyone fits the true definition of a “supremacist,” it’s those overbearing “Jewish supremacists” that have a say-so in virtually every aspect of our lives.

One day that will no longer be the case…

John

Comment from Jeanette
Time January 20, 2009 at 11:24 pm

I have a question what do your people have against wholly europeons that have handicaps and birth defects they are still YOUR people turn your back on them because they are different even if they do have blonde hair and blue eyes. I have blonde hais and blue eyes so I’m probably a fucking europeon but in no way shape or from do I act like you people.The website just gets me going I like to argue but I got off the subject.If someone could let me know the answer

Comment from billy roper
Time January 21, 2009 at 3:00 am

We are interested in improving the quality of the human species overall, and allowing those with severe congetical defects to survive uses up resources which could be used for others, and allowing them to reproduce continues the crime forward to future generations. If you haven’t figured it out, we don’t believe that everything and everyone is of equal value, potential, or worth. Quality, rather than quantity, is what matters, for the greater good of the species as a whole. It’s called eugenics, it’s solid science, and it works.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 21, 2009 at 3:13 am

Drew,

Do I think it was wrong for the Jehovahs Witnesses to be treated the way they were treated, both in the U.S., as well as in Germany and many other countries on both sides, during W.W. II?

Well, during wartime, any group which refuses to serve in the military, refuses to pledge allegiance to the flag or sing the national anthem, and states that they do not support their country in its struggle to survive, while fighting men are dying to protect them, right or wrong, should not be surprised when they are considered hostile elements, and traitors. Kind of like yourself.

Unlike reality, which is not subjective as your pal Misty claims, “wrong” is perspectival. I view what is good for my race as good, and what is bad for my race as being bad. That’s my standard of morality. So, really, I couldn’t say that what happened to the Jehovah’s Witnesses was wrong. If some of them were of good genetic material, then their deaths were unfortunate and regrettable, but in the middle of a conflict which killed sixty million people, most of them White, a couple thousand religious extremists one way or another isn’t a major issue of concern for me. I mean, more than 100 times that many German women and children were intentionally firebombed to death in more than one German city, more than once, by the U.S. and British, to try to terrorize them into surrendering. Within that context, I could care less about the J.W.’s.

Comment from drew
Time January 21, 2009 at 6:51 am

the fact that you say that ones of your own kind that is handicap should die says alot about you what if you got into a car accident and were handicap would you want your people to leave you and say you are using important resourses

Comment from Jeanette
Time January 21, 2009 at 10:40 am

That really doesn’t make sense Billy. Rather everybody is created equal or not. They are your people your race those are the ones that should be helped but then it would take away from you all hating other races so much. I checked out the martin luther king. org website and found out it is a bunch of racist that set it up trying to infect Gods children with your diseases. I told you KARMA is coming around foe everyone against God and you better hope like Drew said you never get into a car wreck because “your” people will leave you to die including your S O since she in this race thing with you.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 21, 2009 at 11:23 am

Once again, just in case you haven’t noticed, we don’t believe in equality, either between the races, nor within our race, nor between individuals. Just because someone is genetically White doesn’t mean necessarily that their genes are particularly valuable and worth passing on to the next generation for further honing and evolution, if they have genetic defects which would be transmitted on to the next generation. If a person is no longer able to take care of themselves or contribute anything to the group, and has no potential for recovery or improvement, then their continued existence is not in the best interests of the group as a whole. That doesn’t mean that we might not have charity and keep them alive in certain circumstances, out of pity…hell, I’m a conservationist and avidly support feeding and taking care of animals which don’t directly benefit us, out of kindness and compassion, but we do not have any compelling NEED to value the lives of unproductive people, and must be willing to put the good of the whole above the good of any individual.

Comment from drew
Time January 21, 2009 at 11:52 am

so you care more for animals than 75% of humans? think about that

Comment from Barry
Time January 21, 2009 at 3:44 pm

Time to turn the hate term on its ear.
Hate is used as nothing but a code word that will ultimately lead to a white suicide.
Until people learn to see through the fog of the controlled media , the white race will only continue to fall and decline.
Spreading the message like this is the key to white survival.
It’s white heritage not hate!

Comment from Jeanette
Time January 21, 2009 at 9:00 pm

This message is for John . Let me guess some racist told you about a “fake” birth certificate right. Well the must of been wrong(like most of the people on this sight) because as of yesterday he became everybody’s 44th president(like it or not including YOURS). If you haven’t noticed this isn’t the revolutionary war times so what them people would of done doesn’t even matter and second tat obama crimes site was probably invented by a racisr such as yourself I have yet to visit it but I’m sure I will because I will always stand up for what is right even if they are handicap(regardless of color) and no longer able to care for themselves. See Im in the nursing field even the elderly that are racist aren’t treated any different than my kind(I am a white woman with 5 Bi-Racial childern and PROUD of it)I don’t claim the white race. I don’t hate as you do I really don’t associate with them because of people like you. But your president is BARACK like it or not

Comment from Latino416
Time January 21, 2009 at 9:45 pm

you’re all a bunch of desperate losers who follow a stupid philosophy. this country never belonged to any of you or us! this country belonged to the native Americans… you can’t say it’s yours… this is an immigrant nation and immigrants today deserve a chance just as your immigrant ancestors deserved theirs… you ancestors would be ashamed of you…

Comment from billy roper
Time January 22, 2009 at 10:37 am

What Darwin said about race mixing:

CHARLES R. DARWIN
ON RACE-MIXING

When two distinct races are crossed, it is notorious that the tendency in the offspring to revert to one or both parent forms is strong, and endures for many generations.

The Earl of Powis formerly imported some thoroughly domesticated humped cattle from India, and crossed them with English breeds, which belong to a distinct species; and his agent remarked to me, without any question having been asked, how oddly wild the cross-bred animals were.

These latter facts remind us of the statements, so frequently made by travellers in all parts of the world, on the degraded state and savage disposition of crossed races of man. That many excellent and kind-hearted mulattos have existed no one will dispute; and a more mild and gentle set of men could hardly be found than the inhabitants of the island of Chilce, who consist of Indians commingled with Spaniards in various proportions. On the other hand, many years ago, long before I had thought of the present subject, I was struck with the fact that, in South America, men of complicated descent between Negroes, Indians, and Spaniards, seldom had, whatever the cause might be, a good expression.1 Livingstone,- and a more unimpeachable authority cannot be quoted,- after speaking of a half-caste man on the Zambesi, described by the Portuguese as a rare monster of inhumanity, remarks, “It is unaccountable why half-castes, such as he, are so much more cruel than the Portuguese, but such is undoubtedly the case.” An inhabitant remarked to Livingstone, “God made white men, and God made black men, but the Devil made half-castes.”2 When two races, both low in the scale, are crossed the progeny seems to be eminently bad. Thus the noble-hearted Humboldt, who felt no prejudice against the inferior races, speaks in strong terms of the bad and savage disposition of Zambos, or half-castes between Indians and Negroes; and this conclusion has been arrived at by various observers.3 From these facts we may perhaps infer that the degraded state of so many half-castes is in part due to reversion to a primitive and savage condition, induced by the act of crossing, even if mainly due to the unfavourable moral conditions under which they are generally reared.

Journal of Researches, 1845, p. 71.
Expedition to the Zambesi, 1865, pp. 25, 150.
Dr. P. Broca, on ‘Hybridity in the Genus Homo,’ Eng. translat., 1864, p. 39.

No man in his senses would expect to improve or modify a breed in any particular manner, or keep an old breed true and distinct, unless he separated his animals.

It is a very surprising fact that characters should reappear after having been lost for many, perhaps for hundreds of generations. But when a breed has been crossed only once by some other breed, the offspring occasionally show a tendency to revert in character to the foreign breed for many generations – some say, for a dozen or even a score of generations. After twelve generations, the proportion of blood, to use a common expression, of any one ancestor, is only 1 in 2048; and yet, as we see, it is generally believed that a tendency to reversion is retained by this very small proportion of foreign blood.

How strongly these domestic instincts, habits, and dispositions are inherited, and how curiously they become mingled, is well shown when different breeds of dogs are crossed. Thus it is known that a cross with a bull-dog has affected for many generations the courage and obstinacy of greyhounds; and a cross with a greyhound has given to a whole family of shepherd-dogs a tendency to hunt hares.

Some species have a remarkable power of crossing with other species; other species of the same genus have a remarkable power of impressing their likeness on their hybrid offspring.

I think these authors are right, who maintain that the ass has a prepotent power over the horse, so that both the mule and the hinny more resemble the ass than the horse; but that the prepotency runs more strongly in the male-ass than in the female, so that the mule, which is the offspring of the male-ass and mare, is more like an ass, than is the hinny, which is the offspring of the female-ass and stallion.

Charles Darwin, The Variation of Plants and Animals under Domestication, 2nd ed., John Murray, London, 1875, vol. II, pp. 8; 19; 21; 62-63; The Origin of Species, 1st ed., Penguin, London, 1968; pp. 196; 239 (see also 1875: 1/43); 275; 287 (see also 1875: 2/43).

Comment from billy roper
Time January 22, 2009 at 10:44 am

Do I like animals better than I like most people?

My system of morality dictates that once a species or race is no longer threatening mine or in competition with mine, either in the food chain or in competition for food, resources, or territory, then they no longer become a threat, and can be treated generously, in fact we have a moral obligation to behave paternally towards them, some would say, and that’s why so many racialists are also conservationists. Since the evolution of the species occurs through group selection as different subgroups which have become differentiated and specialized compete to see which among them is “most fit”, the different races are still in competition, and I cannot afford them the generosity and benevolence which I can afford to lower animals whose role relative to my own, for now, has been determined.

Comment from syianmoon
Time January 22, 2009 at 10:57 am

so what, if martin l.king, had sex with 10.000 women, he still got the job he started done, noone is jesus or a saint what about washington, jefferson, polk. talf,or any other man no one man is above temptation fool. you are just crazy and abut adam, there is no passage in the bible, that say,s a damn thing about adam blushing, maybe in thoes stephen king books like wanda says you read.

Comment from 4horsemen
Time January 22, 2009 at 12:02 pm

response to LATINO416- Native Indians may have been here before us but all it took was a little fire water and small chunks of land to satisfy them, now they run their casinos and drink lots of whiskey. If White europeans didnt come settle this land and it was only indians it would be like any other 3rd world poverty sticken country. They were savages… much like the mexican illegals who break the law and come here burdening our welfare system and poppin babies out left and right because the more babies, the bigger the free handout. That will cancel itself out before long and natural selection will take over. The strong will move forward and like all throughout history, the weak will fall. get over it, but I am glad you do take the time to come to the site, it shows you live in fear and concern of what is to come and know once Whites finally do unite, which wont be long I feel, it will be strong and swift and the weak will be put back in their place once again.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 22, 2009 at 12:19 pm

The Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible compiled by the highly respected scholar Dr. James Strong gives this for the meaning of Adam: “to show blood (in the face), i.e.to flush or turn rosy.”

You can verify this by obtaining a Strong’s Concordance. Make sure it is not abridged as in some instances modern editors shorten the complete definition. For example the online Strong’s Concordance found at Crosswalk.com gives only a shorten meaning stating the word Adam means red, redden, dyed red etc.

As to his comments about English and the indo-germanic languages I suggest you click here

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:HxOcYTT2YLoJ:www.ensignmessage.com/archives/hebrew1.html+%22English+and+Hebrew+words%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us

Comment from sickofhearingit
Time January 22, 2009 at 12:44 pm

To all white anti-nationilists,

I’ve been reading through these emails sent to your site and some of them are just plain ridiculous. All this Obama bullshit, how great he is blah blah blah. What has he done, other than be part black? How we as White racialists don’t have a cause to do what we do…blah blah blah. I say this, don’t watch the news for a month, better yet, use that time and visit your local black community. Do some hands on research. Offer a helping hand. Actually, just go for a walk through one of their drug infested shitholes, take some time and talk to the groups of young black men peddlin’ their crack on the corners and in the stairwells. I bet your sorry asses don’t make it out of your car.

See the problem is this. You only live in a dream world where you believe we can all co-exist in harmony. Take a look around, when is the last time you went to “tha hood” and sat down with a “poor” black family for dinner. In fact, when is the last time you had a black over for dinner at your house. Every “community” that is majority black, is turned into a slum. High crime, narcotics, violent assaults, weapons etc. Every community these animals move into they destroy.

So in closing, shut your liberal mouths and let us clean up the shit. Spend more time helping those “poor missunderstood black folk” and less time harrassing people trying to make a better life for OUR people.

Comment from Jahan
Time January 22, 2009 at 6:48 pm

Reply to “Latino416″

A loser is someone who accepts conquest by people like you.

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time January 22, 2009 at 9:09 pm

Only a piece of shit would try to justify Martin Luther Kings Plagiarism, Adultery and Woman beating by saying no man is above temptation. I guess that’s why we have plenty of sports “hereos” doing the things they do today. Because pieces of shit like yourself have such low standards and morals for the men you hold up as examples for children to learn from.

Comment from syianmoon | [e]
Time January 22, 2009 at 10:57 am

so what, if martin l.king, had sex with 10.000 women, he still got the job he started done, noone is jesus or a saint what about washington, jefferson, polk. talf,or any other man no one man is above temptation fool. you are just crazy and abut adam, there is no passage in the bible, that say,s a damn thing about adam blushing, maybe in thoes stephen king books like wanda says you read.

Comment from David Jansen
Time January 23, 2009 at 6:46 pm

Why would any decent White woman be proud of having five mongrel bi racial kids. That only downgrades you. In my eyes, you are not only a race traitor, but a slut. You should be ashamed, not proud. Any woman that that would sleep with an ape man would probably have sex with any other animal. You discust me. You are an example of woman who have no shame. A White woman who is proud of what she is, proud of her race, was raised properly, and respects her parents, would never sleep with a black man. The unforgiveable sin is to lie down with the beast of the field, it says in the bible. I think it is referring to animals, but a black man is a kind of animal.

Comment from Chris Quimby (aka Wanda the Fat negress)
Time January 23, 2009 at 8:08 pm

i,m sorry i just got to come clean, i,m mad at all black people because, i was in love with a black girl and she didn,t, want me she ran off with my dad now my mother crys all the time please for give me people.

(Editors note: Yeah this is real cute, just about the typical reaction one should expect from a unevolved primate. When all else fails try to impersonate me all you like but next time at least try to use proper sentence structure and punctuation. I’m has a apostrophe in it not a comma you stupid nigger. Signed the real Chris Quimby.)

Comment from wand
Time January 23, 2009 at 10:23 pm

why Quimby i don;t know what in the name on god;s green earth you;er talking about ape man, you got silky hairl like an ape, long ass arms like an ape, pot belly like an ape, short stubbie legs like an ape, flat ass like an ape, just look how the white man body and white women bot are shape now that;s pitiful Paris Hilton body. Beonce’s Body look and learn now,snow neeeggggggeeerrr.

Comment from Chris Quimby
Time January 23, 2009 at 10:32 pm

I’m sorry can you write in english please. I do not understand this nigger gibberish you keep putting on our comments section. Seriously can you at least try to write a comprehensible sentence or has your friday night crack smoking binge already fried what little of a brain you might of had?

Comment from billy roper
Time January 24, 2009 at 1:20 am

Blacks are, genetically, more closely related to chimpanzees and other lower primates than Whites are, as a scientific fact, as any forensic anthropologist can tell you.

http://www.livescience.com/health/070412_rhesus_monkeys.html

But of course, one doesn’t have to have a PhD. to see the family resemblance,lol.

Comment from Ted
Time January 26, 2009 at 11:26 am

Lol Billy Lol

Comment from Bob
Time January 28, 2009 at 11:03 am

What are you people trying to do here? You are trying to justify your comments here by referring us to more racist websites. And your comments have no meaning because, honestly, what if it was true that black people have a lower IQ than whites? What is that proving? In my mind we are all different so if one race has a slightly lower IQ that doesn’t mean they are not as good. You may be trying to prove that whites are better than anyone else, but your problem is that, if you returned to elementary school, you would learn that that is only an opinion and can never be proven. Now we have a black president, and a very intelligent one at that, and I think that the only thing this has proved is that your organization and others like yours have done nothing to keep life like it was in the Civil War era. How dare you write such lies on the web as that Obama had a mother that was a whore. Obama won states such as Virgnia, that were previously in the Confederacy. However, I can understand that you woudn’t be able to write anything that didn’t hurt other people. Why don’t you and all your little buddies go start a new country where slavery is allowed and see the support you get. Times are changing for the better and I suggest you change with it.

Comment from billy roper
Time January 28, 2009 at 1:10 pm

Fifty-seven percent of Whites voted against Obama, and that doesn’t include the twenty percent of eligible White voters who refused to vote because they feel that the system is too corrupt to participate in any more…you know, those who think that it’s too late for voting to do any good, and a bit too early yet to start shooting the bastards, in this awkward pre-revolutionary period. Compared to the one-third of the colonial population which wanted independence from Britain in 1776, those are pretty good odds.

Humans use language to classify all kinds of things, from TV ratings to waves used by surfers, we classify and categorize everything we come upon, including species of animals, and how cold the temperature feels rather than how cold it really is—called wind chill. We are a social organism, that happens to use language, and we construct classification systems or taxonomies throughout science, including the “social construction” of mental illness. There are endless debates among psychiatrists about what mental disorders are disorders at all, and how they should be classified and what symptoms should be used to classify them. Does that mean that mental disorders are a “social construct?” Of course! Does it also mean that mental illness therefore is not real? No, just that mental illness—just like human races—comes in some very clear-cut categories while others are rather fuzzy and hard to determine.

So calling something a “social construction” is meaningless, and is just the jargon used within the postmodernist movement to discredit “Western” science—because it is practiced by biased, evil and racist Whites. Our evilness even makes us collaborate on inventing quarks, mathematics, and black holes, not to mention pointing out that races differ in average intelligence.

Now that the mainstream researchers have amassed such a large body of data leading to the Jensenist conclusion that different races differ in average intelligence, and those differences are 80% heritable by the time a child reaches early adulthood, this knowledge threatens virtually every program by egalitarians to blame Whites for the “people of color’s” circumstances such as poverty, crime, poor health, etc. (East Asians, as “people of color,” do better than Whites on intelligence tests, according to the egalitarians, because they have some super-secret social-culture that makes them study very very hard.)

The Left then has only a few tools for keeping Jensenism from public discourse since they have not been able to find the mysterious factor x as coined by Arthur R. Jensen (factor x is an environmental cause for average differences in mental ability between races that can withstand scientific scrutiny). One of course is simply to deny that race exists. The second is to claim that anyone who even studies general intelligence and finds differences between races is practicing immoral science, because moral scientists just do not do that—which is a circular argument because science cannot even define what morality is much less decide what is moral. Lastly, alternative types of intelligence have been promoted such as Howard Gardner’s “multiple intelligences,” and Robert Sternberg’s “triarchic” theory of intelligence. Both of these scientists get tremendous press and Internet exposure, but neither relies on scientific data to back up their theories. Like social scientists, they use narratives and anecdotal examples, and have been criticized for not providing research by other scientists in the field of mental ability.

Over 100 years of research on general intelligence now clearly shows that Jensenism is the preferred model on what intelligence is and how it differs between races. Unfortunately, the Left has kept this information out of the media and out of policy considerations. If only one representative or one senator would have had the courage to ask how the No Child Left Behind program was going to work, when racial differences in innate intelligence is why Blacks and Hispanics fail in school, rather than the schools failing the students, things would not look so bleak for science when it clashes with the Left’s agenda.

Comment from Fio
Time January 31, 2009 at 5:54 am

My ancestors came from ITALY, GERMANY & FINLAND and when they came to America they worked hard & learned ENGLISH & Never blamed other races for their lives!

KEEP THE FAITH & Hopefully the SATANIC WHITE LIBERAL MARXIST SCUMBAGS will wake up!

Comment from David Jansen
Time January 31, 2009 at 11:44 am

To Bob, We don’t believe in slavery any more than you do. We don’t want slaves; at least I don’t. we just want separation of races, we want black on White crime to stop, we want race mixing to stop, we want segration to come back in schools, and we want them to stay out of our neighborhoods, out of our music, and out of our culture. To me, I would love to send every one of them back to their motherland; Africa. And while were at it send the mexicans back to Mexico. I hate black rap music, I hate their ebonics, their cutlture, their faces, their smell, their dress, and everything about them. They are a cancer to our society. Just imagine a country without them. The crime rates would drop drastically, taxes could go down because of less welfare, less cops needed, less prison space and costs. Just imagine how great our lives would be without the ghettos, with their cime and drugs and scum on every corner. Almost paradise. And one other thing. When you brag about Obama’s intelligence, remember he is half white. And also, his mother was a whore. She slept with a black man back when it was a strong taboo. It was not so long ago that it was against the law for black and white to marry. There was even a time that if a white woman was caught with a black man, she would be tarred and feathered and he would be whipped. The good old days! Obamas’s daddy, being the typical black man, left her, which makes Barrack a bastard. And her, White trash. Obama only saw his daddy once. Anyway, we don’t want them for slaves. We want them out of our sight, period.

Comment from rob
Time February 4, 2009 at 10:32 am

I am in no way questioning your goals. Your goals are your goals, how could anyone question them? However, I do question how they are executed.

To dominate is to lead, not to eliminate and not to control.

Did it occur to you that the two leading factors in hate crimes are black supremacists, and white supremacists? By those two opposing forces being in existence, they automatically cause conflict. We spread hate against them, they spread hate against us. The end result is that people like you (and equally, black supremacists) are causing hatred against races. Your the reason white girls are raped, and white people are attacked. Likewise, your counter part, black supremacists, are the reason that black girls are raped and black people are attacked.

Evil begets evil. Hatred begets hatred.

Notice how 99% of the time, the highly educated black man is not associated with crime? Likewise the highly educated white man is not associated with crime.

Your overlooking the bottom line. Ignorance is the problem, not race. By spreading hate and intolerance, your doing nothing more than breeding more ignorance which will turn into hatred towards the black man which will in turn make the black man hate us. Thus, we end up being attacked. Thus, we attack back.

To say that life would be better without the ghettos, drugs, and scum is 100% correct. However by saying that you also prove my point. Who lives in the ghettos? Who does the drugs? Who robs mini-marts? The uneducated, and the ignorant. Both white, and black. Again, ignorance is the problem, not the color.

You are correct to say that the average IQ levels of African Americans are lower than the average white persons IQ levels. Statistics are statistics are statistics. If you were a true leader, and truly concerned for the safety and integrity of the American population, you would be educating those which weren’t as intelligent as you. Not hating them. Instead you take the easy road. The weak road. You spread hate, and because of that your counter-productive to your own cause.

For the record, I’m white and I’m of German/Swedish decent. I’m also a bastard, as my father left my mother. By the time I was 18 he owed 80,000 in child support. He was white.

Comment from billy roper
Time February 4, 2009 at 10:54 am

Hatred and intolerance doesn’t cause conflict between the races, nor does ignorance. Contact between different races does. Just as hatred and intolerance between dogs and cats doesn’t keep them from getting along, or prevent mutual appreciation between sheep and wolves, nature uses competition, and promotes true diversity to encourage conflict, for the purpose of continuing group natural selection and the evolution of the species.

Competition and conflict between the races is natural. I’m not calling for an end to it. I’m simply an unabashed advocate for my own people, and their interests. Fighting against an enemy doesn’t imply that one wants an end to war, but rather an end to one’s enemies. I don’t want to educate them, or increase their IQs genetically or otherwise. I don’t want to civilize them, or domesticate them. I don’t want to make them better neighbors, or economically or socially or behaviorally more equal to us. I don’t want to dominate them. I want to eliminate them. I don’t want to lead them, except to their extinction. I don’t want to convert them, except perhaps to fertilizer. So, perhaps you misunderstand my ultimate goals, after all.

Go ahead and cry about it. Tell me how mean and evil I am. That won’t change nature’s laws, or how natural selection works, nor will it change how the evolutionary process occurs. In the end, either our ancestors or theirs will inherit the earth, not both together, and not a mixed-race muddy combination. Whichever race realizes this most fully and acts on it most thoroughly will win. The rest will become extinct. It’s really very simple and straight-forward.

Comment from rob
Time February 4, 2009 at 11:24 am

I’m not crying about it, nor do I care. It’s of no concern of mine. I’m simply stating from a very basic psychological stand point, your execution of evolution is a forced “we’re smarter, we’re stronger” one. In the process, your creating anger which is causing white females to be raped and killed.

Well, I know what your going to say so let me rephrase that. The “we’re smarter, we’re stronger” mentality is what’s causing the problems. Not you personally, and not some kind of natural racial competition.

Why does a “lesser race” need to be extinct? Humans in general also like to think that animals are a lesser race. Yet if animals we’re extinct, we’d starve to death in the first year.

For someone who’s so gun-hoe about natural courses, you don’t seem to learn much from them. Not only are “lesser races” tolerated and recognized as important, it’s also arguable that the natural course of things has lead us to where we are now, and your trying to go against that natural course.

For example, racial segregation was existent in the past, and we’ve evolved past it. That was the natural course. By you saying that we should go back to that, is almost proving that your against the natural course, and that your stuck in the past. Not able to progress further.

Again, nothing I say is a judgment against your person, as I don’t know you. I’m only giving you a very different and logical perspective on the way of thinking that you’ve decided to dedicate yourself too.

Comment from billy roper
Time February 4, 2009 at 12:04 pm

Multiracialism is not the natural course, just as it would not have been the natural course for our Cro-Magnon ancestors and the Neanderthal to have miscegenated and interbred, rather than having competed. They did compete, and the Neanderthal became extinct.

Other animal species don’t have to become extinct, in fact we can afford to act paternally and graciously towards them, because they are no longer in direct competition with us for resources or territory, or in the food chain, or for genetic hegemony. If the snail darter or spotted owl occupied the same potential biological niche as my descendants, I’d be hunting them to extinction, too.

Do you think that dinosaurs should have accepted their oncoming extinction as the natural course when the climate started getting cooler, or should they have railed against the dying of the light, if they had had the means, the intelligence, and the will to do so? Fighting for one’s survival, and the survival and interests of one’s own kind, is the most natural and healthy response in the world. Saying that it doesn’t concern one, is not. I don’t know…., Asperger’s, maybe?

Comment from rob
Time February 4, 2009 at 1:13 pm

It’s of no concern of mine because what your talking about is completely irrelevant to any kind of survival whatsoever. The only thing that could have it’s survival “threatened” is the numerical percentage of white people in a given country. If all your concerned about is being the dominant race, then your nothing more than self absorbed egomaniac with no real cause.

There is absolutely nothing to be gained by “white supremacy” except the massaging of the egos of those who care enough to bother noticing who’s “dominant”. You can’t even argue that Africans are coming over here and taking our jobs, because it would make no sense to say that. How many Americans move to other countries and get jobs? Plenty. Should Europeans drag Americans behind trucks because on occasion one of us moves over there and gets a job, which in turn takes a job from a “native” to that country?

Generally speaking, the term “survival” is used in conjunction with the fear of not being able to survive. That would suffice to say that you were, in essence, scared of other races.

You must have been raised a Christian. Only Christians are egotistical enough to believe that everything they say is right, and everyone should be like them. Which (you seem educated enough to know) is completely ridiculous. Considering Christianity in itself is a very young 3000 year old belief system based on ideas and concepts stolen from other (much older) religious propaganda from the Cabala, the Koran, etc.

It would seem this conversation is getting a little long for comments. You have my email (from the comment form), feel free to email me if you’d rather move it off the comments section.

Comment from Connor
Time February 4, 2009 at 2:45 pm

There is certainly something to be said for the preservation of distinct recessive genetic traits (such as red hair) unique to Caucasians. But the whole idea of races is misunderstood. I have brown hair and eyes. In ancient Norway, those traits could have made me a member of a different “race” to them. As travel in Europe became easier, the genes of different populations mixed. “Race-mixing” is the same thing, on a global scale.

Comment from Connor
Time February 4, 2009 at 2:46 pm

Sorry, hadn’t finished that…

Might I also suggest that you not use the Bible as justification for your beliefs. If you do, the logical conclusion is that, by Deuteronomy 7:6, Jews are, in fact, superior in God’s eyes.

Comment from billy roper
Time February 5, 2009 at 9:12 am

Rob,

From an evolutionary viewpoint, every organism has a biological drive to see its own genes, and those most like its own genetic material, survive and flourish, even at the expense of others. That’s the whole purpose behind the drive to reproduce, which is one of the most basic and powerful drives we have. A more advanced moral platform would take into account the best interests of the species as a whole, which actually coincides with my personal biological self interests in that natural group selection and competition between the races is beneficial to the continued advancement and honing of the species as a whole. In fact, working against or decrying the eventual supremacy, as you insist on referring to it, of one race over the others, is counterproductive to the best interests of the species because it would mean a derailing or postponement of the evolutionary process just so lesser evolved folks wouldn’t have their feelings hurt or feel discriminated against.

But I don’t necessarily want future generations of my species to be like me, I want them to be BETTER than me, by continuing to evolve and advance and improve. In that regard I can recognize a higher purpose than mere self-preservation and replication.

I have no interest in continuing the conversation privately by emailing you because my job is not to privately convince you, but rather to better arm my people in how to deal with different questions and objections from anti’s which they might encounter in the future. I just literally don’t have the time to engage in private discussions with every person who would like to question my beliefs or debate with me, unless that, too, serves a higher purpose beyond the two of us having the discussion.

Connor,

It is true that ethnic differences are similar in kind to racial differences, but not in scale, so that ethnicities are potential subspecie (races) which might emerge as more distinctly differentiated and specialized types if the more severe gradations separating competing races themselves within a species are eliminated by the biological extinction of all but one of the competing subspecies. For example, if hypothetically all nonWhites became extinct, it is true that the White race would become the new de facto species and then continue to subdivide and compete within itself as it differentiated more and specialized more internally creating new competing races from existing ethnicities and genotypes. That’s how the evolutionary process would continue, and has in the past. Natural selection and the competition between types of a kind is the consistent pattern, regardless the of scale or degree of differentiation.

I don’t necessarily need to use the Bible to support my beliefs, but if you do, you should know that those who called themselves Jews today are descended from converts from Khazaria who are not descended from Abraham and therefore did not inherit his covenant with God and are not, then, His Chosen pets. This comprises Eastern European, or Ashkenazi, Jews, who are the majority in the U.S., and Europe, and Israel, by the way.

What I’ve always found interesting about Gentile Judeophiles is that if they really think that the Jews are God’s Chosen, they should encourage their children to marry them and reproduce with them so that their grandchildren would be Chosen, too, based on their logic, if it was consistent. But they don’t, and it isn’t.

What I do know is that God made the different races, and made them separate, and I know what the word “adultery” means in the ten commandments, which has nothing to do with cheating on your spouse, unless one does it with someone of a different race. So I know that anyone who encourages race-mixing or participates in it is defying God and His plan.

Comment from Ryan J. Murdough
Time February 17, 2009 at 6:38 am

The anti whites who are coming onto this site and insulting prideful white people will unfortunately only wake up when their house is getting broken into and their familymembers are being slaughtered for a few dollars.

Make no mistake, if things do not change in this country, those things will happen and you will remember that it was us hateful bigots who told you so.

Comment from Billy Roper
Time March 10, 2009 at 1:35 am

We are going to disable public comments. We feel it is a great waste of organization energy to spend time debating antis when we could focus our efforts in other more productive things. Anyone who has a serious question can e-mail me at roper_billy@yahoo.com.